Cited by 232Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Health and Development

Breast-feeding is associated with reduced perceived stress and negative mood in mothers

Mezzacappa, Elizabeth Sibolboro, Katkin, Edward S.·2002·Health Psychology

Abstract

Two studies examined the effects of breast-feeding on maternal stress and mood. In Experiment 1, perceived stress in the past month was compared between 28 breast-feeding and 27 bottle-feeding mothers. Breast-feeding mothers reported less perceived stress, after controlling for demographic confounds. In Experiment 2, mood ratings were assessed in the same 24 mothers both before and then after 1 breast-feeding and 1 bottle-feeding session. Breast-feeding was associated with a decrease in negative mood, and bottle-feeding was associated with a decrease in positive mood from pre- to postfeeding. Results indicated that breast-feeding buffers negative mood. These effects appeared to be attributable to the effects of breast-feeding itself and not solely to individual-differences factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.21.2.187

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-report studies confirm oxytocin's role in reducing stress: breast-feeders reported less perceived stress than bottle-feeders, than mothers who never breastfed before, and than those who breastfed in the past but who had stopped breastfeeding.

    “Self-report studies confirm oxytocin’s role in reducing stress: breast-feeders reported less perceived stress than bottle-feeders, than mothers who never breastfed before, and than those who breastfed in the past but who had stopped breastfeeding (Mezzacappa and Katkin, 2002).”

    From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Mezzacappa and Katkin, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mezzacappa, E. S., & Katkin, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2002-03
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
187-193
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2011506307
Cited by
232
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000645, M01 RR00645)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
breastfeeding, bottle feeding, maternal stress, perceived stress, negative mood, positive mood, maternal mental health, infant feeding
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Anger, Anxiety, Breast Feeding, Depression, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Oxytocin, Stress, Psychological, United States, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review