Cited by 364Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adherence to exercise prescriptions: Effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency.

Abstract

Sedentary adults (N = 379) were randomly assigned in a 2 x 2 design to walk 30 min per day at a frequency of either 3-4 or 5-7 days per week, at an intensity of either 45%-55% or 65%-75% of maximum heart rate reserve. Analyses of exercise accumulated over 6 months showed greater amounts completed in the higher frequency (p = .0001) and moderate intensity (p = .021) conditions. Analyses of percentage of prescribed exercise completed showed greater adherence in the moderate intensity(p = .02) condition. Prescribing a higher frequency increased the accumulation of exercise without a decline in adherence, whereas prescribing a higher intensity decreased adherence and resulted in the completion of less exercise.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.21.5.452

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 1990, Position stand: The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy adults., Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 22, 265
  2. Dishman, 1997, Adherence to physical activity., 63
  3. 10.1037/0278-6133.19.4.354 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jama.266.11.1535 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1001/archinte.149.11.2565 · DOI
  6. 10.1001/jama.273.5.402 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Pollock, 1988, Prescribing exercise for fitness and adherence., 259
  8. Spector, 1985, The GLM procedure., 433

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 362

Metadata

Authors
Perri, M. G., Anton, S. D., Durning, P. E., Ketterson, T. U., Sydeman, S. J., Berlant, N. E., Kanasky, W. F., Newton, R. L., Limacher, M. C., & Martin, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
452-458
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2040307130
Cited by
364
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL58873, R01HL058873)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00082, M01RR000082)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
exercise adherence, exercise prescription, walking, exercise intensity, exercise frequency, heart rate reserve, sedentary adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Physical Fitness, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review