Cited by 1,027Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology Research

Lexical access in bilingual speech production: evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners

Costa, Albert, Santesteban, Mikel·2004·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Corresponding author
Costa, Albert
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
491-511
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076575613
Cited by
1,027
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 46
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
lexical access, bilingual speech production, language switching, picture naming, dominant language, second language learners, lexicalization, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, naming latency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review