The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Differences in the Behavioral Response to Spatial and Object Novelty in Adult C57BL/6 Mice.
Abstract
The present studies examined sex differences in object localization and recognition in C57BL/6 mice. Experiment 1 measured responses to spatial novelty (object displacement) and object novelty (object substitution). Males strongly preferred displaced and substituted objects over unchanged objects, whereas females showed a preference in only 1 measure of object novelty. Experiment 2 further examined object recognition by presenting mice with 2 identical objects, followed 24 hr or 7 days later by testing with a familiar and a novel object. After 24 hr, males preferentially explored the novel object, whereas females exhibited no such preference. Neither sex displayed a preference for the novel object after 7 days. The data suggest that male mice are superior to females at localizing and recognizing objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: behavioral data
Ennaceur, A., & Delacour, J. (1988) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(88)90157-x · Cited by 3,223
Sex differences in route-learning
Galea, L. A. M., & Kimura, D. (1993) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90174-2 · Cited by 487
Cited by
Object recognition test in mice
Leger, M., Quiedeville, A., Bouet, V., Haelewyn, B., Boulouard, M., Schumann-Bard, P., & Freret, T. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.155 · Cited by 1,357
Dnmt3a regulates emotional behavior and spine plasticity in the nucleus accumbens
LaPlant, Q., Vialou, V., Covington, H. E., Dumitriu, D., Feng, J., Warren, B. L., Maze, I., Dietz, D. M., Watts, E. L., Iñiguez, S. D., et al. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2619 · Cited by 612
Modeling menopause: The utility of rodents in translational behavioral endocrinology research
Koebele, S. V., & Bimonte-Nelson, H. A. (2016) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.01.015 · Cited by 293
Sex differences in the brain: Implications for behavioral and biomedical research
Choleris, E., Galea, L. A. M., Sohrabji, F., & Frick, K. M. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.005 · Cited by 214
Self-citationSex differences in hippocampal function
Koss, W. A., & Frick, K. M. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.23864 · Cited by 156
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Frick, K. M., & Gresack, J. E.
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1283-1291
- ISSN
- 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0084
- OpenAlex
- W2074183373
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Differences in the Behavioral Response to Spatial and Object Novelty in Adult C57BL/6 Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0735-7044.117.6.1283
- The paper
- Frick, K. M., & Gresack, J. E. (2003). Sex Differences in the Behavioral Response to Spatial and Object Novelty in Adult C57BL/6 Mice. Behavioral Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.117.6.1283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
