Cited by 252Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibitory Control in Rats Performing a Stop-Signal Reaction-Time Task: Effects of Lesions of the Medial Striatum and d-Amphetamine.

Eagle, D. M., Robbins, T. W.·2003·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The stop-signal task measures the ability to inhibit a response that has already been initiated, that is, the ability to stop. Imaging studies have implicated frontostriatal circuitry in the mediation of this form of response control. The authors report inhibition functions of normal rats and those with medial striatal damage performing the stop-signal task. Excitotoxic lesions of the medial striatum produced significant deficits on task performance, including increased omissions on the go task and flattened inhibition function, possibly as a result of increased reaction-time mean and variability. Medial striatal lesions also significantly slowed stop-signal reaction time. Subsequent treatment with d-amphetamine removed (0.3 mg/kg) or exacerbated (1.0 mg/kg) this deficit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.117.6.1302

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0735-7044.113.2.253 · DOI
  3. Cardinal, 2001, Whisker (Version 2.2)
  4. 10.1037/0735-7044.115.4.812 · DOI
  5. Christakou, 2001b, Functional disconnection of medial prefrontal cortex and medial caudate-putamen: Effects on performance on a visual attention task in the rat., Brain and Cognition, 47, 35
  6. Crofts, 2001, Frontostriatal involvement in the inhibitory control of behavior., Brain and Cognition, 47, 37
  7. Douglas, 1984, The psychological processes implicated in ADD., 147
  8. Eagle, 2002, Cambridge Stop Task Operant Paradigm. Unpublished computer software
  9. 10.1017/S0021963001006709 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–252 of 252

Metadata

Authors
Eagle, D. M., & Robbins, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2003-12
Volume
117
Issue
6
Pages
1302-1317
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W1991271750
Cited by
252
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
inhibitory control, stop-signal task, medial striatum, excitotoxic lesions, d-amphetamine, frontostriatal circuits, response inhibition, reaction time
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Corpus Striatum, Dextroamphetamine, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Motor Activity, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review