The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of anticipatory stress on decision making in a gambling task.
Abstract
Recent research has highlighted the fact that emotion that is intrinsic to a task benefits decision making. The authors tested the converse hypothesis, that unrelated emotion disrupts decision making. Participants played the Iowa Gambling Task, during which only experimental participants anticipated giving a public speech (A. Bechara, D. Tranel, & H. Damasio, 2000). Experimental participants who were anticipating the speech learned the contingencies of the choices more slowly, and there was a gender interaction later in the game, with stressed female participants having more explicit knowledge and more advantageous performance and stressed male participants having poorer explicit knowledge and less advantageous performance. Effects of anticipatory stress on decision making are complex and depend on both the nature of the task and the individual.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Preston et al. (2007) found that this speech topic elicited stress in both men and women.”
From Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress (2012) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“We chose these procedures because their validity and effectiveness in inducing stress has been demonstrated in previous studies (e.g., Kirschbaum et al., 1993; Preston et al., 2007).”
From Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress (2012) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Stress has also been found to increase risky decision-making in a driving task in older adults, but not in younger adults (Mather et al., 2009), and a few studies have reported gender differences in decision-making under stress (Preston et al., 2007; Lighthall et al., 2009; van den Bos et al., 2009; Takahashi et al., 2010).”
From Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress (2012) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“gender differences have been observed in studies that utilize stress manipulations (Preston et al., 2007; Lighthall et al., 2009; van den Bos et al., 2009; Takahashi et al., 2010).”
From Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress (2012) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Since neurochemicals released in response to stress (e.g., dopamine and glucocorticoids) have receptors in the PFC, decision making processes that depend on PFC can be directly affected by stress (e.g., Preston et al., 2007).”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Preston et al. (2007) demonstrated that stressed participants learned more slowly on the IGT than the control group.”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“This also supports Preston et al.’s (2007) argument that under stress, decision making shifts away from deliberative PFC processing towards subcortical areas of the brain and allows automatic, amygdala-mediated processing to dominate.”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Stress interferes with the learning process in healthy controls, increases risk-taking behavior and leads to disadvantageous card selections on the IGT (Preston et al., 2007; Miu et al., 2008; van den Bos et al., 2009; Robinson et al., 2015; Simonovic et al., 2017a; Starcke et al., 2017).”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“These data support previous findings that stress impairs learning and leads to a slower elimination of disadvantageous deck selection (Preston et al., 2007; Starcke et al., 2017; Wemm and Wulfert, 2017).”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Preston et al. (2007) suggested that anticipatory stress shifts cognitive processes away from deliberative processing towards automatic processing, and thus impairs differentiation between advantageous and disadvantageous choices”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Preston et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05473.1999 · Cited by 2,001
Self-citationTwo routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0306408101 · Cited by 848 · cited 1×
“Such a system is beneficial for shifting processing under stress away from slower, more deliberative processes that depend on the PFC (Gabrieli, Poldrack, & Desmond, 1998) and toward more automatic, reflexive processes that depend on subcortical areas like the amygdala (Kensinger & Corkin, 2004).”
BackgroundArnsten, A. F. T. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5370.1711 · Cited by 341
Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (1996) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(96)80078-x · Cited by 301 · cited 1×
“Most of the work on stress and cognition has looked at memory, finding that intrinsic emotion affects memory in an inverted-Ushaped fashion (e.g., Cahill & McGaugh, 1996; Joseph, 1999; Van Londen et al., 1998).”
BackgroundDomes, G., Heinrichs, M., Reichwald, U., & Hautzinger, M. (2002) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(01)00085-3 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency
Cyders, M. A., & Smith, G. T. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0013341 · Cited by 1,136
The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies
Robinson, O. J., Vytal, K., Cornwell, B. R., & Grillon, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00203 · Cited by 613
van den Bos, R., Harteveld, M., & Stoop, H. (2009) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.016 · Cited by 369
Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty
Heilman, R. M., Crişan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0018489 · Cited by 369
Stress and the adolescent brain
Tottenham, N., & Galván, A. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.030 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Preston, S. D., Buchanan, T. W., Stansfield, R. B., & Bechara, A.
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-263
- ISSN
- 1939-0084
- 0735-7044
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (PO1 NS19632)
- National Science Foundation (IIS 04-42586)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
