Cited by 369Stress Responses and CortisolNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Stress and decision-making in humans: performance is related to cortisol reactivity, albeit differently in men and women

van den Bos, Ruud, Harteveld, Marlies, Stoop, Hein·2009·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Acutely elevated levels of cortisol are associated with euphoria and reward-like properties related to sensation-seeking behaviour. Thus, acute stress and elevated levels of cortisol may promote risk-taking behaviour. High cortisol responders are more sensitive to immediate rewards than low cortisol responders. In this study we therefore tested whether acute stress in male and female subjects, induced by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), affects decision-making as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and to what extent this is related to cortisol reactivity. Control subjects did not receive the stress manipulation. We specifically predict that high responders show risk-taking behaviour in the IGT compared to low responders and controls. The data show that the more (salivary) cortisol levels are elevated after the TSST the poorer the subsequent performance in the IGT in male subjects. In female subjects an inverse relationship between cortisol levels and IGT performance is observed: slightly elevated levels of cortisol after the TSST improve IGT performance, while highly elevated levels decrease IGT performance. Thus, acute stress as induced by the TSST affects decision-making behaviour of men and women differently and cortisol reactivity is associated with decision-making performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.016

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HPA functioning has been linked to risk-taking behavior in standardized laboratory tasks.

    “HPA functioning has also been linked to risk-taking behavior in standardized laboratory tasks (e.g., Lighthall et al., 2009; van den Bos et al., 2009; van Honk, 2003)”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as van den Bos et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Bos, R., Harteveld, M., & Stoop, H.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
1449-1458
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107723514
Cited by
369
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
acute stress, cortisol response, decision-making, risk-taking, sex differences, Trier Social Stress Test, Iowa Gambling Task, salivary cortisol, reward sensitivity, sensation seeking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Risk-Taking, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review