The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of environmental support and strategy training on older adults’ use of context.
Abstract
Age-related cognitive differences may be due, in part, to difficulties using task-relevant context in a proactive manner. Two studies evaluated different methods for increasing older adults' use of context in the AX-Continuous Performance Task (H. E. Rosvold, A. F. Mirsky, I. Sarason, E. D. Bransome, & L. H. Beck, 1956), which evaluates components of context processing. The results suggest that (a) age differences in the use of context are not due to reduced access to cue information, (b) directed strategy training made older adults' context processing performance more like that of young adults, and (c) similar performance changes could be observed with less directed instruction and extended practice. These results suggest that age-related differences in context processing can be ameliorated by directed strategy training or extended practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous studies have already reported the malleability of cognitive control mechanisms engaged in the AX-CPT due to experience-based conditions such as bilingualism (Morales et al., 2013, 2015) or different kinds of training interventions”
From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Paxton et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Sheikh (1986) · doi:10.1300/j018v05n01_09 · Cited by 7,236
Working memory: Looking back and looking forward
Baddeley, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1201 · Cited by 5,200
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 · Cited by 3,666
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
A continuous performance test of brain damage
Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Bransome, E. D., & Beck, L. H. (1956) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043220 · Cited by 2,261
An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging.
West, R. L. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.272 · Cited by 2,157
Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment
Katzman, R., Brown, T., Fuld, P. A., Peck, A., Schechter, R., & Schimmel, H. (1983) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.140.6.734 · Cited by 2,119
Principles of Frontal Lobe Function
Stuss, D. T. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.001.0001 · Cited by 1,731
Control of Cognitive Processes
Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1481.001.0001 · Cited by 1,650
(2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.001.0001 · Cited by 1,529
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kausler, 1994, Learning and memory in normal aging.
- 10.1037/0882-7974.13.2.206 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework
Braver, T. S. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010 · Cited by 2,482
Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex.
Braver, T. S., Paxton, J. L., Locke, H. S., & Barch, D. M. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808187106 · Cited by 689
Cognitive Control, Goal Maintenance, and Prefrontal Function in Healthy Aging
Paxton, J. L., Barch, D. M., Racine, C. A., & Braver, T. S. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm135 · Cited by 447
Cognition-based interventions for healthy older people and people with mild cognitive impairment
Martin, M., Clare, L., Altgassen, A. M., Cameron, M. H., & Zehnder, F. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006220.pub2 · Cited by 350
Castel, A. D. (2007) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(07)48006-9 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Paxton, J. L., Barch, D. M., Storandt, M., & Braver, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 499-509
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W1985639194
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (5 T32 AG00030)
- National Institutes of Health (5 R01 MH06607803)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- context processing, older adults, age-related cognitive decline, strategy training, environmental support, AX-CPT, practice effects, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Association Learning, Attention, Awareness, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Practice, Psychological, Problem Solving, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Reference Values, Retention, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
