Cited by 689Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex.

Open access
Braver, Todd S., Paxton, Jessica L., Locke, Hannah S., Barch, Deanna M.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A major challenge in research on executive control is to reveal its functional decomposition into underlying neural mechanisms. A typical assumption is that this decomposition occurs solely through anatomically based dissociations. Here we tested an alternative hypothesis that different cognitive control processes may be implemented within the same brain regions, with fractionation and dissociation occurring on the basis of temporal dynamics. Regions within lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) were examined that, in a prior study, exhibited contrasting temporal dynamics between older and younger adults during performance of the AX-CPT cognitive control task. The temporal dynamics in younger adults fit a proactive control pattern (primarily cue-based activation), whereas in older adults a reactive control pattern was found (primarily probe-based activation). In the current study, we found that following a period of task-strategy training, these older adults exhibited a proactive shift within a subset of the PFC regions, normalizing their activity dynamics toward young adult patterns. Conversely, under conditions of penalty-based monetary incentives, the younger adults exhibited a reactive shift some of the same regions, altering their temporal dynamics toward the older adult baseline pattern. These experimentally induced crossover patterns of temporal dynamics provide strong support for dual modes of cognitive control that can be flexibly shifted within PFC regions, via modulation of neural responses to changing task conditions or behavioral goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0808187106

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distinct executive control strategies (proactive versus reactive) have been proposed to support cognitive flexibility.

    “the adjustment of distinct executive control strategies (proactive versus reactive), which have been proposed to support cognitive flexibility2 (Braver et al., 2009; Burgess et al., 2011; Braver, 2012).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Braver et al., 2009

  • Proactive and reactive control adjustment can be assessed by considering the proportion of errors in AY and BX type trials.

    “Proactive and reactive control adjustment can be assessed by considering the proportion of errors in AY and BX type trials (Braver et al., 2009; Morales et al., 2013; Chiew and Braver, 2014).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Braver et al., 2009

  • The AX-CPT is widely used to explore the dynamic adjustment of cognitive control strategies and it has shown to be very sensitive to individual differences in cognitive control.

    “The AX-CPT is widely used to explore the dynamic adjustment of cognitive control strategies and it has shown to be very sensitive to individual differences in cognitive control (Braver et al., 2009; Burgess et al., 2011; Braver, 2012).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Braver et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braver, T. S., Paxton, J. L., Locke, H. S., & Barch, D. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-05-05
Volume
106
Issue
18
Pages
7351-7356
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2134266007
Cited by
689
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 29
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066078, R0I MH66078)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
cognitive control, executive function, lateral prefrontal cortex, proactive control, reactive control, temporal dynamics of neural activity, aging, financial incentives, AX-CPT, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Neurons, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review