Cited by 29Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Dual-task performance as a function of adult age and task complexity

Lorsbach, Thomas C., Simpson, Greg B.·1988·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

A dual-task procedure was used to examine capacity demands of letter-matching in younger and older adults. Older subjects generally were slower on both tasks than were younger adults, but this difference was especially pronounced for the late stages of category matching, suggesting that retrieval and comparison of category information is particularly demanding for older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.3.2.210

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to young people, the performance of the elderly is especially impaired when the complexity of the task is raised.

    “In diverse experimental settings and problem domains a so-called complexity effect has been demonstrated, indicating that relative to the young, the performance of the elderly is especially impaired when the complexity of the task is raised (Czaja & Sharit, 1993;Gilinsky & Judd, 1994;Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988).”

    From Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency (2002) · cites this paper as Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988

  • Performance was especially poorer in the more complex far-transfer domain, which is a confirmation of earlier research findings (Czaja & Sharit, 1993; Gilinsky & Judd, 1994; Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988).

    “Performance was especially poorer in the more complex far-transfer domain, which is a confirmation of earlier research findings (Czaja & Sharit, 1993;Gilinsky & Judd, 1994;Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988).”

    From Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency (2002) · cites this paper as Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorsbach, T. C., & Simpson, G. B.
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
1988
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
210-212
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2018216912
Cited by
29
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
dual-task performance, aging, older adults, task complexity, letter matching, cognitive aging, processing speed, age differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review