Cited by 81Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

Cognitive load theory and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills in the elderly: towards an integrative framework

W. M. Van Gerven, Fred G. W. C. Paa, Pascal·2000·Educational Gerontology

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the advantages of instructional formats based on cognitive load theory for elderly learners engaged in the acquisition of complex cognitive skills. A great body of research has demonstrated that cognitive aging is accompanied by a reduction of working - memory capacity, a general slowing of mental processes, and a decline of the ability to repress irrelevant information. The core idea of cognitive load theory is that working - memory capacity is limited and should therefore be managed with great care and discretion. Cognitive load theory claims that this can be achieved by minimizing the level of extraneous cognitive load, which is the portion of load that does not contribute to schema acquisition, and by maximizing the level of germane cognitive load, which directly contributes to the construction of cognitive schemata. Since instructions based on cognitive load theory deal with cognitive limitations, in that they lead to an efficient use of the available resources, it was hypothesized that they are especially effective when elderly people are involved. This idea was analyzed by means of a framework merging cognitive load theory with the aforementioned research findings concerning cognitive aging. It was concluded that cognitive load theory, enabling elderly people to acquire new complex skills, can be regarded as an essential guide for educational gerontology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03601270050133874

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If schema construction recurs, the result is an accumulation of schemata and a lowering of the perceived task complexity.

    “If this process recurs, the result is an accumulation of schemata and a lowering of the perceived task complexity (Van Gerven, Paas, Van Merrie ¨nboer, & Schmidt, 2000).”

    From Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency (2002) · cites this paper as Van Gerven et al., 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
W. M. Van Gerven, F. G. W. C. P.
Venue
Educational Gerontology
Published
2000-09
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
503-521
ISSN
  • 0360-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0472
OpenAlex
W2140754839
Cited by
81
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive load theory, older students, cognitive aging, working memory capacity, extraneous cognitive load, germane cognitive load, instructional design, schema acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review