CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 225Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Abuse and Trauma

Parent and Peer Predictors of Physical Aggression and Conflict Management in Romantic Relationships in Early Adulthood.

Linder, Jennifer Ruh, Collins, W. Andrew·2005·Journal of Family Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.252
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Violence between romantic partners is widespread, but developmental precursors of perpetration and victimization are little understood. Among participants followed from birth to 23 years of age, familial and extrafamilial childhood and adolescent relationships were examined in connection with couple violence in early adulthood. Predictors included early childhood physical abuse and witnessing of parental partner violence, features of parent-child interactions at the age of 13 years, and close friendship quality at the age of 16 years. Controlling for early familial violence, intrusive or overly familiar behavior in videotaped parent-child collaborations at 13 years of age consistently predicted violence perpetration and victimization in early adulthood. Friendship quality at the age of 16 years contributed over and above familial predictors. Understanding the role of both familial and extrafamilial close relationship precursors may lead to effective strategies for ameliorating the problem of romantic partner violence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.252

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents exposed to marital violence have more conflictual romantic relationships, use aggressive conflict styles more often, and view dating aggression as more justifiable.

    “adolescents exposed to marital violence have more conflictual romantic relationships, more often use aggressive conflict styles, and more often view dating aggression as justifiable (Kinsfogel & Grych, 2004; Linder & Collins, 2005; Reitzel-Jaffe & Wolfe, 2001).”

    From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as Linder & Collins, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Linder, J. R., & Collins, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Linfield College (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2005-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
252-262
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
DOI
10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.252
OpenAlex
W2021840299
Cited by
225
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
physical aggression, conflict management, early adulthood, child physical abuse, parent-child interaction, peer relationships, friendship quality, intimate partner violence perpetration, intimate partner violence victimization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child Abuse, Conflict, Psychological, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Peer Group, Parenting, Domestic Violence, Crime Victims, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review