The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory–II.
Abstract
This article provides psychometric information on the second edition of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II; A. T. Beck, R. A. Steer, & G. K. Brown, 1996), with respect to internal consistency, factorial validity, and gender differences. Both measures demonstrated high internal reliability in the full student sample. Significant differences between the mean BDI and BDI-II scores necessitated the development of new cutoffs for analogue research on the BDI-II. Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a 2-factor solution optimally summarized the data for both versions of the inventory and accounted for a cumulative 41% and 46% of the common variance in BDI and BDI-II responses, respectively. These factor solutions were reliably cross-validated, although the importance of each factor varied by gender. The authors conclude that the BDI-II is a stronger instrument than the BDI in terms of its factor structure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“BDI-II has shown high internal consistency with alpha coefficient >0.90, furthermore, it has shown adequate validity in terms of diagnostic discrimination as well as validity in terms of factorial and content validity”
From Evaluation of a Novel Psychological Intervention Tailored for Patients With Early Cognitive Impairment (PIPCI): Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial (2020) · cites this paper as Dozois et al., 1998
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B. (1966) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · Cited by 13,554
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 · Cited by 11,696
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change
Garfield, S. L., Bergin, A. E., & Dryden, W. (1987) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.1.4.264a · Cited by 3,998
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_179754 · Cited by 2,095
Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research.
Cole, D. A. (1987) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.55.4.584 · Cited by 1,089
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale
Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. A. P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2007) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014 · Cited by 2,288
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review
Wang, Y.-P., & Gorenstein, C. (2013) · Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048 · Cited by 1,577
The intolerance of uncertainty scale: psychometric properties of the English version
Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2002) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00092-4 · Cited by 1,391
The Assessment of Present-Moment Awareness and Acceptance: The Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale
Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107311467 · Cited by 940
Kühner, C., Bürger, C., Keller, F., & Hautzinger, M. (2007) · Der Nervenarzt · doi:10.1007/s00115-006-2098-7 · Cited by 935
Metadata
- Authors
- Dozois, D. J. A., Dobson, K. S., & Ahnberg, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-89
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W1963771706
- Cited by
- 1,517
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 74
- FWCI
- 11.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Beck Depression Inventory-II, Beck Depression Inventory, depression assessment, psychometric properties, internal consistency, factorial validity, gender differences, cut-off values, factor structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review