Cited by 135Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

A Multi-Attitude Suicide Tendency Scale for adolescents.

Orbach, Israel, Milstein, Ilana, Har-Even, Dov, Apter, Alan, Tiano, Sam, Elizur, Avner·1991·Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.398

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orbach, I., Milstein, I., Har-Even, D., Apter, A., Tiano, S., & Elizur, A.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1991-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
398-404
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2089700903
Cited by
127
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
suicidality, adolescents, suicide risk assessment, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review