Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The new rules of measurement.

Embretson, Susan E.·1996·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Classical test theory, which the authors maintain applied psychologists are still too often exclusively taught, are contrasted with the new rules of measurement. In the newer, model-based version of test theory, called item response theory (IRT), some well-known rules of measurement o longer apply. Six old rules of measurement that conflict with the new rules are reviewed, and intuitive xplanations of the new rules are provided. Readers are also directed to additional informational sources about IRT, which, it is argued, every psychologist hould be familiar with. In an ever-changing world, psychological testing remains the flagship of applied psychology. Although both the context of application and the legal guidelines for using tests have changed, psychological tests themselves have been relatively stable. Many historically valued tests, in somewhat revised forms, remain in active current use. Further, although several new tests have de-veloped in response to contemporary needs in applied psychol-ogy, the principles underlying test development have remained constant. Or have they?

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Embretson, S. E.
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
1996-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
341-349
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2083879993
Cited by
469
References
22
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The new rules of measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341
The paper
Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.