Cited by 408Resilience and Mental HealthPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies

Flourishing under fire: Resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving.

Ryff, Carol D., Singer, Burton·2003·Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10594-001

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived.
Published
2003
Pages
15-36
OpenAlex
W2306743733
Cited by
408
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 18
FWCI
31.55
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Keywords
resilience, thriving, eudaimonia, adversity, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review