The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance.
Abstract
Given the increased reliance on teams in many organizational settings, it is critical that all those who are interested in improving training and performance better understand team dynamics. During the past decade, cognitive science has substantially influenced the study of team performance and has helped develop the field of team cognition. The contributors to this volume describe the many ways in which team cognition is being used as an organizing framework to guide research into factors that affect team coordination. Nowadays, team cognition must be considered not only within conventional teams, but also across time and space in distributed teams, and - because of increased use of artificial team members (e.g., intelligent agents) - across people and machines. All of these complicating factors are considered, along with methodological issues that surround the process of measuring and defining team cognition. The unique blend of theory and data in this multidisciplinary book will be of value to psychologists and academics interested in cognition and organizational behavior, to team researchers and practitioners in Industry and the military, and to graduate students Interested in group processes and performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Holden, R. J., Carayon, P., Gurses, A. P., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A. S., Ozok, A. A., & Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J. (2013) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.838643 · Cited by 1,221
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004 · Cited by 352
Communication in virtual teams: a conceptual framework and research agenda
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005 · Cited by 291
A multi-level framework of inclusive leadership in organizations
Nishii, L. H., & Leroy, H. (2022) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011221111505 · Cited by 189
Group Awareness Tools: It’s What You Do with It That Matters
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2004
- OpenAlex
- W1561036010
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/10690-000
- The paper
- Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. (2004). American Psychological Association eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1037/10690-000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.