The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“their scales of organizational constraints and interpersonal conflict had negative meta correlations ( -.11 and -.10, respectively) with supervisor-rated performance, whereas their scale of quantitative overload had a positive meta correlation with performance (.16).”
From A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects (2008) · cites this paper as Spector & Jex, 1998
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462 · Cited by 1,616
Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, and Disease: Is the Bark Worse than the Bite?
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1987) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x · Cited by 1,010
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects
GILBOA, S., SHIROM, A., FRIED, Y., & COOPER, C. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x · Cited by 1,072
Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016 · Cited by 637
Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery
Barber, L. K., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2015) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038278 · Cited by 502
Sonnentag, S., Kuttler, I., & Fritz, C. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.005 · Cited by 484
Mäkikangas, A., & Kinnunen, U. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00217-9 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M.
- ORCID
- Spector, Paul E.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 356-367
- ISSN
- 1939-1307
- 1076-8998
- Cited by
- 1,476
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
