Cited by 367Stress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: Self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample

Mäkikangas, Anne, Kinnunen, Ulla·2003·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00217-9

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mäkikangas, A., & Kinnunen, U.
Affiliations
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Mäkikangas, Anne
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
537-557
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129873987
Cited by
365
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
psychosocial work stressors, well-being, self-esteem, optimism, emotional exhaustion, psychological distress, organizational climate, time pressure, job insecurity, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review