Going to College and Unpacking Hazing: A Functional Approach to Decrypting Initiation Practices Among Undergraduates.
Abstract
Initiation practices likely support group functioning by promoting group-relevant skills and attitudes, reinforcing status hierarchies, and stimulating cognitive, behavioral, and affective forms of social dependency. In field tests of these propositions, 269 under-graduates from same-gender organizations rated their initiation experiences. As pre-dicted, athletes reported relatively more physical challenge and pain, whereas members of Greek-letter organizations reported more social deviance and embarrassment. Hier-archy was positively associated with initiations featuring social deviance but unexpect-edly negatively related to physically and psychologically harsh initiations. Harsh treatment and fun independently predicted group identity. Laboratory experiments on male (n 74) and female (n 37) undergraduates found that discomforting inductions increased social dependence on group opinion and, for women, increased additional forms of dependence (proximity to induction agents and negative mood when left alone). The results across studies suggested that hazing’s task masters are 3: schooling skills and attitudes, conveying hierarchy, and promoting social dependency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hazing is intended to create a sense of dependency on a particular group, and that dependency is intended to evolve into a relationship that encourages and celebrates the continuation of the act as a rite of passage for new potential members.
“Hazing is intended to create a sense of dependency on a particular group, and that dependency is intended to evolve into a relationship that encourages and celebrates the continuation of the act as a rite of passage for new potential members (Keating et al., 2005).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as Keating et al., 2005
Cites
The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.
Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047195 · Cited by 1,297 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Theoretically, harsh initiations arouse dissonance in individuals who engage in activities that violate conceptions of the self (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundInfluentialLandau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., Miller, C. H., Ogilvie, D. M., & Cook, A. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204267988 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Social modulation of stress responses
DeVries, A. C., Glasper, E. R., & Detillion, C. E. (2003) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00152-5 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Hirschberger, G. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.527 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Shirley, Z. E. (2025) · University of North Texas Dissertation · doi:10.12794/metadc500187
- Authors
- Keating, C. F., Pomerantz, J., Pommer, S. D., Ritt, S. J. H., Miller, L. M., & McCormick, J.
- Venue
- Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-126
- ISSN
- 1930-7802
- 1089-2699
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review