Cited by 334Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

The anxiety-buffering function of close relationships: Evidence that relationship commitment acts as a terror management mechanism

Florian, Victor, Mikulincer, Mario, Hirschberger, Gilad·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three studies examined the terror management function of romantic commitment. In Study 1 (N = 94), making mortality salient led to higher reports of romantic commitment on the Dimensions of Commitment Inventory (J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones, 1997) than control conditions. In Study 2 (N = 60), the contextual salience of thoughts about romantic commitment reduced the effects of mortality salience on judgments of social transgressions. In Study 3 (N = 100), the induction of thoughts about problems in romantic relationships led to higher accessibility of death-related thoughts than did the induction of thoughts about either academic problems or a neutral theme. The findings expand terror management theory, emphasizing the anxiety-buffering function of close relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.527

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Hirschberger, G.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
527-542
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2116080378
Cited by
334
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
terror management theory, romantic commitment, close relationships, mortality salience, death-related thoughts, social transgression, relationship problems
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Altruism, Anxiety, Attitude to Death, Death, Defense Mechanisms, Biological Evolution, Existentialism, Female, Humans, Instinct, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Male, Marriage, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Self Concept, Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review