Cited by 463Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluid vulnerability theory: a cognitive approach to understanding the process of acute and chronic suicide risk

Rudd, M. David·2006·Cognition and suicide: Theory, research, and therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/11377-016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–436 of 436

Metadata

Authors
Rudd, M. D.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
Rudd, M. David
Venue
Cognition and suicide: Theory, research, and therapy.
Published
2006
Pages
355-368
OpenAlex
W1744999525
Cited by
463
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
20.02
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicide risk, cognitive approach, suicide prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review