Cited by 687Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementEmployee Performance and Motivation

Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees.

Eisenberger, Robert, Stinglhamber, Florence·2011·American Psychological Association eBooks

Abstract

Today's constantly changing work environment is fraught with job uncertainty, frequent mergers and acquisitions, and a general breakdown of trust between employer and employee. More than ever, it is critical for managers to proactively shift away from devaluing employees as marginal capital to empowering them as human capital. "Perceived organizational support" — employees' perception of how much an organization values their contribution and cares about their well-being — mutually benefits both employees and their organizations and is integral to sustainable employer–employee relationships.\nUsing organizational support theory and evidence gathered from hundreds of studies, Eisenberger and Stinglhamber demonstrate how perceived organizational support affects employees' well-being, the positivity of their orientation toward the organization and work, and behavioral outcomes favorable to the organization. The authors illustrate these findings with employee experiences and strategic approaches of major organizations such as Southwest Airlines, Wal-Mart, Costco, and Google.\nOrganizational psychologists, management consultants, managers, and graduate students will obtain a clear understanding of perceived organizational support and the practical knowledge needed to foster its development and positive outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/12318-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social support from one source tends to spread out to other sources, consistent with the trickle-down effect.

    “This observation is aligned with the trickle-down effect (Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011), suggesting that social support from one source tends to spread out to other sources”

    From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
American Psychological Association eBooks
Published
2011
OpenAlex
W1737795912
Cited by
687
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.45
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
Keywords
perceived organizational support, organizational support theory, employee well-being, organizational commitment, work orientation, labor productivity, employee behavior, organizational psychology, human resource management, organizational strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review