Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees.
Abstract
Today's constantly changing work environment is fraught with job uncertainty, frequent mergers and acquisitions, and a general breakdown of trust between employer and employee. More than ever, it is critical for managers to proactively shift away from devaluing employees as marginal capital to empowering them as human capital. "Perceived organizational support" — employees' perception of how much an organization values their contribution and cares about their well-being — mutually benefits both employees and their organizations and is integral to sustainable employer–employee relationships.\nUsing organizational support theory and evidence gathered from hundreds of studies, Eisenberger and Stinglhamber demonstrate how perceived organizational support affects employees' well-being, the positivity of their orientation toward the organization and work, and behavioral outcomes favorable to the organization. The authors illustrate these findings with employee experiences and strategic approaches of major organizations such as Southwest Airlines, Wal-Mart, Costco, and Google.\nOrganizational psychologists, management consultants, managers, and graduate students will obtain a clear understanding of perceived organizational support and the practical knowledge needed to foster its development and positive outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social support from one source tends to spread out to other sources, consistent with the trickle-down effect.
“This observation is aligned with the trickle-down effect (Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011), suggesting that social support from one source tends to spread out to other sources”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shoss, M. K., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030687 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationGillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.665228 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Wang, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1345740 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Supported Supervisors Are More Supportive, but Why? A Multilevel Study of Mechanisms and Outcomes
Frear, K. A., Donsbach, J., Theilgard, N., & Shanock, L. R. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9485-2 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Günther, N., Hauff, S., & Gubernator, P. (2022) · German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung · doi:10.1177/23970022221083694 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees
Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Ndiaye, A., Colombat, P., & Fouquereau, E. (2020) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12322 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Huyghebaert, T., & Colombat, P. (2016) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2014.05.004 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W1737795912
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Keywords
- perceived organizational support, organizational support theory, employee well-being, organizational commitment, work orientation, labor productivity, employee behavior, organizational psychology, human resource management, organizational strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review