APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 4: Personality processes and individual differences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Online social support tends to have a more significant impact than actual support.
“Ref. [68] argued that online social support tends to have a more significant impact than actual support.”
From What Influences Users’ Intention to Share Works in Designer-Driven User-Generated Content Communities? A Study Based on Self-Determination Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Cites
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
Mischel, W. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035002 · Cited by 3,181 · see citing works
Eastwick, P. W. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0016845 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bartz, J. A., Lydon, J. E., Kolevzon, A., Zaki, J., Hollander, E., Ludwig, N., & Bolger, N. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615580279 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Song, H., Wei, J., & Jiang, Q. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11110540 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2015
- OpenAlex
- W2487854766
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- personality processes, individual differences, personality psychology, social psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review