Cited by 70Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Differential Effects of Oxytocin on Agency and Communion for Anxiously and Avoidantly Attached Individuals

Bartz, Jennifer A., Lydon, John E., Kolevzon, Alexander, Zaki, Jamil, Hollander, Eric, Ludwig, Natasha, Bolger, Niall·2015·Psychological Science

Abstract

Oxytocin promotes prosocial behavior, especially in those individuals who are low in affiliation (e.g., avoidantly attached individuals), but can exacerbate interpersonal insecurities in those preoccupied with closeness (e.g., anxiously attached individuals). One explanation for these opposing observations is that oxytocin induces a communal, other-orientation. Becoming more other oriented should help those people who focus on the self to the exclusion of others, but could be detrimental to those who are other focused but have little sense of an agentic self. Using a within-subjects design, we administered intranasal oxytocin and placebo to 40 males and measured their agency (self-orientation) and communion (other-orientation). Oxytocin produced a slight increase in communion for the average participant; however, as predicted, avoidantly attached individuals were especially likely to perceive themselves as more communal (“kind,” “warm,” “gentle,” etc.) after receiving oxytocin than after receiving the placebo. There was no main effect of oxytocin on agency for the average participant; however, anxiously attached individuals showed a selective decrease in agency (“independent,” “self-confident,” etc.) following administration of oxytocin. These data help explain the complex social effects of oxytocin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797615580279

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartz, J. A., Lydon, J. E., Kolevzon, A., Zaki, J., Hollander, E., Ludwig, N., & Bolger, N.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2015-06-29
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1177-1186
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W1684060298
Cited by
70
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
oxytocin, attachment styles, anxiety, avoidance, agency, communion, self-orientation, other-orientation, prosocial behavior, intranasal oxytocin, self-concept
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Oxytocin, Personality, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review