Cited by 351Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Positive mood and executive function: Evidence from Stroop and fluency tasks.

Phillips, Louise H., Bull, Rebecca, Adams, Ewan, Fraser, Lisa·2002·Emotion

Abstract

Contrasting predictions have been made about the effects of positive mood states on the performance of frontal lobe tests that tap executive functions such as inhibition, switching, and strategy use. It has been argued that positive mood is likely to improve some cognitive processes, particularly those dependent on the frontal cortex and anterior cingulate of the brain. However, there is some evidence that happy mood may impair executive functioning. The current experiments investigated the effects of positive mood on Stoop and fluency tests, which are frequently used to assess executive function. Positive mood impaired performance on a switching condition of the Stroop test, but improved performance on a creative uses test of fluency. The effect of positive mood on an executive task may therefore depend on whether a task is inherently motivating or is impaired by diffuse semantic activation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.12

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive mood, associated with pro-social attitudes, can impair inhibitory control (Stroop performance), increase distractibility, and impair self-other distinction.

    “Positive mood, which is associated with prosocial attitudes, can lead to poor performance on Stroop inhibition tasks (Phillips, Bull, Adams & Fraser, 2002), increased distractibility (Dreisbach & Goschke, 2004), and impairment of the ability to distinguish self from others (Stroessner, Mackie & Michalsen, 2005).”

    From Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation (2010) · cites this paper as Phillips, Bull, Adams & Fraser, 2002

  • Findings from mood and cognition research are consistent with the hypothesis that social attitudes modulate mimicry via effects on inhibitory mechanisms.

    “The results of studies investigating the effect of mood on cognition are consistent with the hypothesis that social attitudes modulate mimicry via their effects on inhibitory mechanisms.”

    From Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation (2010) · cites this paper as Phillips, Bull, Adams & Fraser, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, L. H., Bull, R., Adams, E., & Fraser, L.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2002
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
12-22
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2129577781
Cited by
351
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
positive mood, executive function, Stroop task, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, task switching, semantic activation, motivation, frontal lobe function
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Attention, Color Perception, Creativity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Phonetics, Problem Solving, Reading, Mental Recall, Reference Values, Semantics, Students, Verbal Behavior, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review