The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components.
Open accessAbstract
The nature of the association between anger and 5 appraisal-action tendency components--goal obstacle, other accountability, unfairness, control, and antagonism--was examined in terms of specificity, necessity, and sufficiency. In 2 studies, participants described recently experienced unpleasant situations in which 1 of the appraisal-action tendency components was present or absent and indicated which emotions they had experienced. The results showed that (a) other accountability and arrogant entitlement, as an instance of unfairness, are specific appraisals ability for anger; and most important, (b) none of the components is necessary or sufficient for anger. The findings suggest that the relation between emotions and appraisal-action tendency components should be conceptualized instead as a contingent association, meaning that they usually co-occur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061 · Cited by 3,072
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
Schwarz, N. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93 · Cited by 2,846
Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212 · Cited by 2,379
Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.
Berkowitz, L. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59 · Cited by 2,283
What's basic about basic emotions?
Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.315 · Cited by 2,015
Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939308409189 · Cited by 1,302
Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions.
Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899 · Cited by 827
Cited by
Beat them or ban them: the characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt
Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103 · Cited by 723
The Emotion Process: Event Appraisal and Component Differentiation
Scherer, K. R., & Moors, A. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854 · Cited by 688
Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling
Lewis, M. D. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0500004x · Cited by 618
Appraisal Antecedents of Shame and Guilt: Support for a Theoretical Model
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206290212 · Cited by 574
van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311430835 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J. M., & De Boeck, P.
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 254-269
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W2014716105
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.254
- The paper
- Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J. M., & De Boeck, P. (2003). The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
