Cited by 574Emotions and Moral BehaviorPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Appraisal Antecedents of Shame and Guilt: Support for a Theoretical Model

Tracy, Jessica L., Robins, Richard W.·2006·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Four studies used experimental and correlational methods to test predictions about the antecedents of shame and guilt derived from an appraisal-based model of self-conscious emotions (Tracy & Robins, 2004). Results were consistent with the predicted relations between appraisals (i.e., causal attributions) and emotions. Specifically, (a) internal attributions were positively related to both shame and guilt; (b) the chronic tendency to make external attributions was positively related to the tendency to experience shame; and (c) internal, stable, uncontrollable attributions for failure were positively related to shame, whereas internal, unstable, controllable attributions for failure were positively related to guilt. Emotions and attributions were assessed using a variety of methods, so converging results across studies indicate the robustness of the findings and provide support for the theoretical model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167206290212

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shame is associated with feelings of inferiority and worthlessness for a defective self while guilt is associated with feelings of tension and remorse.

    “Therefore, shame is associated with feelings of inferiority and worthlessness for a defective self while guilt is associated with feelings of tension and remorse [30].”
  • Shame is linked to a stable internal and negative perception of the entire self; guilt appears when people attribute an adverse outcome to unstable causes.

    “While the feeling of shame is linked to a stable internal and negative perception of the entire self (e.g., “I’m a bad person), guilt appears when people attribute an adverse outcome to unstable causes (e.g., “I’ve made a bad mistake”).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2006-10
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
1339-1351
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2057397577
Cited by
574
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
shame, guilt, self-conscious emotions, emotion appraisal, causal attribution, internal attribution, external attribution, attributional style, failure attribution, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Affect, Attitude, Guilt, Humans, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Shame

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review