Cited by 69Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

A contextual cognitive-behavioral analysis of rehabilitation workers' health and well-being: Influences of acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action.

McCracken, Lance M., Yang, Su-Yin·2008·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

Purpose: Rehabilitation settings can be extremely demanding, and sometimes stressful, places to work.It is important, therefore, to consider in uences on rehabilitation workers’ health and general well-beingand on their ability to face emotional, physical, or mental challenges at work. The purpose of this studywas to examine a set of psychological processes, including psychological acceptance, mindfulness, andvalues-based action, that may be relevant to this problem. Method: Ninety-eight rehabilitation workersat the Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, completed measures of backgroundvariables, health, and functioning, in addition to the 3 psychological variables of primary interest.Results: Correlation analyses demonstrated signi cant relations of the acceptance, mindfulness, andvalues measures with the measures of stress, burnout symptoms, health, and well-being, particularlygeneral health perception, vitality, social functioning, and emotional functioning. In regression analyses,the process variables accounted for signi cant, and in some cases practically meaningful, increments inexplained variance in 10 key outcomes related to work experience and health. Conclusion: Acceptance,mindfulness, and values-based action deserve further consideration in relation to burnout, health, andwell-being among rehabilitation workers.Keywords: work stress, well-being, acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive behavioral approaches

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012854

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from this study confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in psychological distress (31%).

    “Commensurate with several previous studies (McCracken & Yang, 2008; Noone & Hastings, 2011; Vilardaga et al., 2011), findings from this study also confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in psychological distress (31%)”
  • Findings from this study confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in cognitive weariness (10%).

    “Commensurate with several previous studies (McCracken & Yang, 2008; Noone & Hastings, 2011; Vilardaga et al., 2011), findings from this study also confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in psychological distress (31%), and several aspects of burnout: physical fatigue (14%), emotional exha”
  • Findings from this study confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in physical fatigue (14%).

    “Commensurate with several previous studies (McCracken & Yang, 2008; Noone & Hastings, 2011; Vilardaga et al., 2011), findings from this study also confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in psychological distress (31%), and several aspects of burnout: physical fatigue (14%)”
  • Findings from this study confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in emotional exhaustion (8%).

    “Commensurate with several previous studies (McCracken & Yang, 2008; Noone & Hastings, 2011; Vilardaga et al., 2011), findings from this study also confirm the role played by mindfulness and values in explaining significant proportions of variance in psychological distress (31%), and several aspects of burnout: physical fatigue (14%), emotional exha”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCracken, L. M., & Yang, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2008-11
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
479-485
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W2018802770
Cited by
69
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
rehabilitation professionals, occupational stress, burnout, psychological acceptance, mindfulness, values-based action, employee well-being, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive-behavioral approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review