CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fatigue during breast cancer radiotherapy: an initial randomized study of cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis

Montgomery, Guy H., Kangas, Maria, David, Daniel, Hallquist, Michael N., Green, Sheryl, Bovbjerg, Dana H., Schnur, Julie B.·2009·Health Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0013582
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study purpose was to test the effectiveness of a psychological intervention combining cognitive-behavioral therapy and hypnosis (CBTH) to treat radiotherapy-related fatigue. DESIGN: Women (n = 42) scheduled for breast cancer radiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive standard medical care (SMC) (n = 20) or a CBTH intervention (n = 22) in addition to SMC. Participants assigned to receive CBTH met individually with a clinical psychologist. CBTH participants received training in hypnosis and CBT. Participants assigned to the SMC control condition did not meet with a study psychologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fatigue was measured on a weekly basis by using the fatigue subscale of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) and daily using visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Multilevel modeling indicated that for weekly FACIT fatigue data, there was a significant effect of the CBTH intervention on the rate of change in fatigue (p < .05), such that on average, CBTH participants' fatigue did not increase over the course of treatment, whereas control group participants' fatigue increased linearly. Daily data corroborated the analyses of weekly data. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that CBTH is an effective means for controlling and potentially preventing fatigue in breast cancer radiotherapy patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013582

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Montgomery, G. H., Kangas, M., David, D., Hallquist, M. N., Green, S., Bovbjerg, D. H., & Schnur, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • Binghamton University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Health Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2009-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
317-322
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
DOI
10.1037/a0013582
OpenAlex
W2009779398
Cited by
112
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Cancer Society (RSGPB-04-213-01-CPPB; PF-05-098-01-CPPB)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
breast cancer, cognitive behavioral therapy, hypnosis, psychological intervention, fatigue prevention, FACIT-Fatigue Scale
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Combined Modality Therapy, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Radiation Injuries, Sick Role, Suggestion, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Muscle Weakness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review