Cited by 240Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Radiotherapy-related fatigue

Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja, Marsiglia, Hugo Raul, Orecchia, Roberto·2002·Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

Abstract

Radiotherapy-induced fatigue is a common early and chronic side-effect of irradiation, reported in up to 80 and 30% of patients during radiation therapy and at follow-up visits, respectively. It is frequently underestimated by medical and nursing staff, only about 50% of patients discuss it with a physician and in one fourth of cases any intervention is proposed to the patient. The patients rarely expect fatigue to be a side-effect of treatment. The etiology of this common symptom, its correlates and prevalence are poorly understood. In numerous studies the level and time course of fatigue was demonstrated to depend on the site of tumor and treatment modalities. For example, psychological mechanisms have been proposed to explain fatigue in women receiving irradiation for early breast cancer, whereas decline in neuromuscular efficiency rather than psychological reasons can lead to the fatigue observed in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Fatigue can affect global quality of life more than pain, sexual dysfunction and other cancer- or treatment-related symptoms. Several interventions have been tested in the management of radiotherapy-related fatigue and some randomized studies have been recently published. Although an optimal method has not yet been established, some promising results have been reported with relaxation therapy, group psychotherapy, physical exercise and sleep. Further methodologically correct studies are warranted to define better the causes, optimal prevention and management of this symptom.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1040-8428(01)00143-3

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jereczek-Fossa, B. A., Marsiglia, H. R., & Orecchia, R.
Affiliations
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
317-325
ISSN
1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968760806
Cited by
240
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
radiation side effects, chronic fatigue, breast cancer radiotherapy, prostate cancer radiotherapy, quality of life, fatigue management, relaxation training, group therapy, physical activity, sleep, neuromuscular efficiency, psychological mechanisms
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review