Cited by 428Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Cancer-related fatigue: A systematic and meta-analytic review of non-pharmacological therapies for cancer patients.

Kangas, Maria, Bovbjerg, Dana H., Montgomery, Guy H.·2008·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a significant clinical problem for more than 10 million adults diagnosed with cancer each year worldwide. No "gold standard" treatment presently exists for CRF. To provide a guide for future research to improve the treatment of CRF, the authors conducted the most comprehensive combined systematic and meta-analytic review of the literature to date on non-pharmacological (psychosocial and exercise) interventions to ameliorate CRF and associated symptoms (vigor/vitality) in adults with cancer, based on 119 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT studies. Meta-analyses conducted on 57 RCTs indicated that exercise and psychological interventions provided reductions in CRF, with no significant differences between these 2 major types of interventions considered as a whole. Specifically, multimodal exercise and walking programs, restorative approaches, supportive-expressive, and cognitive-behavioral psychosocial interventions show promising potential for ameliorating CRF. The results also suggest that vigor and vitality are distinct phenomena from CRF with regard to responsiveness to intervention. With improved methodological approaches, further research in this area may soon provide clinicians with effective strategies for reducing CRF and enhancing the lives of millions of cancer patients and survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012825

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kangas, M., Bovbjerg, D. H., & Montgomery, G. H.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2008-09
Volume
134
Issue
5
Pages
700-741
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2126050567
Cited by
428
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society (RSG-01-180-01-PBP)
  • US Department of Defense (DAMD17-99-1-9303)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, non-pharmacological treatment, exercise intervention, psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, walking program, restorative interventions, cancer patients, cancer survivors
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Humans, Neoplasms, Social Support, Exercise, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review