Cited by 45Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Development and validation of the child psychosocial distress screener in Burundi.

Jordans, Mark J. D., Komproe, Ivan H., Ventevogel, Peter, Tol, Wietse A., de Jong, Joop T. V. M.·2008·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

In non-Western countries, efficient and contextually valid methods of community screening are scarce. The present study describes the validation of a new, brief, 7-item multi-informant screener for conflict-affected children (Child Psychosocial Distress Screener; CPDS). To determine concurrent validity, the CPSD was administered to 65 children and their teachers. CPDS scores were compared with indication for psychosocial treatment based on an in-depth clinical assessment by a psychiatrist and psychologist. Construct validity was assessed by testing the measurement equivalence of the CPDS in a community sample (N = 2,240) in Burundi. The CPDS identifies indication for treatment with an accurateness of .81(sensitivity of .84; specificity of .60). Test?retest reliability of the instrument is good (.83). A robust and invariant factor structure provides evidence for the construct validity of the CPSD. The CPDS appears to be a useful multidimensional tool that measures nonspecific child psychosocial distress, detecting children with an indication for treatment. Because of brevity and the ability to be administered by nonspecialists, the CPDS can be an appropriate instrument to screen large populations of conflict-affected children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0014216

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jordans, M. J. D., Komproe, I. H., Ventevogel, P., Tol, W. A., & de Jong, J. T. V. M.
Affiliations
  • HealthNet TPO (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
2008
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
290-299
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W2006187771
Cited by
45
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
PLAN
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
psychosocial distress, children in armed conflict, screening tool validation, multi-informant assessment, teacher ratings, measurement invariance, construct validity, test-retest reliability, Burundi, humanitarian settings, child mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Burundi, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Poverty, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Warfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review