Cited by 290Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Traits and Psychology

An exploration of the emotional cascade model in borderline personality disorder

Open access
Selby, Edward A., Anestis, Michael D., Bender, Theodore W., Joiner, Thomas E.·2009·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

The emotional cascade model proposes that the emotional and behavioral dysregulation of individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) may be fundamentally linked through emotional cascades, vicious cycles of intense rumination and negative affect that may induce aversive emotional states. In order to reduce this aversive emotion, dysregulated behaviors such as non-suicidal self-injury may then be used as distractions from intense rumination. This study explored emotional cascades in a sample enriched with participants meeting diagnostic criteria for BPD. The first part of the study explored a structural equation model that examined the mediational effects of emotional cascades on the relationship between BPD symptoms and dysregulated behavior and found evidence for full mediation, even after controlling for symptoms of depression and other Cluster B disorders. The second part of the study examined the effects of a rumination induction conducted with the intention of eliciting emotional cascades in those diagnosed with BPD. The results demonstrated that individuals with BPD experienced greater reactivity and intensity of negative affect, but not of positive affect, following the procedure-even when controlling for current depressive symptoms. Future directions and clinical implications for the emotional cascade model are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0015711

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a risk that persistent ambivalence contributes to persistent rumination and in consequence, to symptoms of overarousal, sleep problems or agitation that may in turn be associated with increased suicidal thoughts or behavior.

    “There is furthermore a risk that persistent ambivalence contributes to persistent rumination and in consequence, to symptoms of overarousal, sleep problems or agitation that may in turn be associated with increased suicidal thoughts or behavior (44, 45).”

    From Ambivalence model of suicidality [ABS-model]: an orientation model for the treatment of suicidal individuals (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Emotional Cascade Model section describes a reinforcing cycle between rumination and negative affect and reports a link between rumination and nonsuicidal self-injury. It does not address persistent ambivalence as a cause of rumination or establish the proposed path through overarousal, sleep problems, or agitation to suicidal thoughts or behavior. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gunderson JG Borderline personality disorder 1984 Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selby, E. A., Anestis, M. D., Bender, T. W., & Joiner, T. E.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Joiner, Thomas E.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2009-05
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
375-387
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W1997775530
Cited by
290
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH081396)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, emotional dysregulation, behavioral dysregulation, rumination, non-suicidal self-injury, negative affect, positive affect, rumination induction, mediation, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Borderline Personality Disorder, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Injurious Behavior, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review