The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time.
Abstract
The recently recognized core construct of psychological capital or PsyCap (consisting of the positive psychological resources of efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience) has been demonstrated to be related to various employee attitudinal, behavioral, and performance outcomes. However, to date, the impact of this positive core construct over time and on important employee well-being outcomes has not been tested. This study meets this need by analyzing the relationship between a broad cross-section of employees' (N = 280) level of PsyCap and two measures of psychological well-being over time. The results indicated that employees' PsyCap was related to both measures of well-being and, importantly, that PsyCap explained additional variance in these well-being measures over time. The limitations, needed future research, and practical implications conclude the article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 · Cited by 18,187
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 · Cited by 7,143
Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947
POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION
LUTHANS, F., AVOLIO, B. J., AVEY, J. B., & NORMAN, S. M. (2007) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x · Cited by 4,809 · cited 1×
“Given this understanding of psychological wellness as a primary resource with reciprocal effects on work-related outcomes, it is important to consider how work-related, secondary resources may extend beyond performance at work to affect one’s wellness.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSocial and Psychological Resources and Adaptation
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307 · Cited by 4,594 · cited 5×
“, efficacy, hope, optimism, and resiliency) fall within the boundaries of COR theory and are explicitly noted as having relevance and aligning with current trends in COR theory (Hobfoll, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDiener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00415 · Cited by 2,508
Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370802393649 · Cited by 2,496
Cited by
Self-efficacy, emotions and work engagement among teachers: a two wave cross-lagged analysis.
Burić, I., & Macuka, I. (2018) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-017-9903-9 · Cited by 270
Belwalkar, S., Vohra, V., & Pandey, A. (2018) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-05-2016-0096 · Cited by 151
Psychological Capital as a Buffer to Student Stress
Riolli, L., Savicki, V., & Richards, J. (2012) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2012.312a178 · Cited by 144
Kim, T. (., Karatepe, O. M., Lee, G., Lee, S., Hur, K., & Xijing, C. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-04-2016-0224 · Cited by 102
Vera Villarroel, P., Urzúa, A., Pavez, P., Celis-Atenas, K., & Silva, J. (2012) · Universitas Psychologica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy11-3.eswa · Cited by 77
Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
Murray, M., Murray, L., & Donnelly, M. (2016) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0431-1 · Cited by 75
Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-03-2020-0065 · Cited by 70
Manzano-García, G., & Ayala, J.-C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02277 · Cited by 66
Sharma, I., & Tiwari, V. (2023) · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · doi:10.1002/joe.22206 · Cited by 52
Understanding the ecology of foreign language teacher wellbeing
Jin, J., Mercer, S., Babic, S., & Mairitsch, A. (2021) · Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64444-4_2 · Cited by 41
PsyCap and Performance: Wellbeing at Work as a Mediator
Imran, M., & Shahnawaz, M. G. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation · doi:10.1177/2319510x20915999 · Cited by 33
A qualitative study of physician perspectives on adaptation to electronic health records
Sieck, C. J., Pearl, N., Bright, T. J., & Yen, P.-Y. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1030-6 · Cited by 26
Lee, S., Han, S.-H. (., Park, S. H., & Chai, D. S. (2026) · European Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-12-2024-0175 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., & Palmer, N. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-28
- ISSN
- 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2167994363
- Cited by
- 1,030
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 68.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
