Cited by 491Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceStress and Burnout ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models

Byron, Kristin, Khazanchi, Shalini, Nazarian, Deborah·2010·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Competing theoretical models and equivocal evidence leave unanswered questions regarding stressors' effect on creativity. The present meta-analysis of 76 experimental studies (including 82 independent samples) aims to clarify this association and identify factors that may explain differences between studies. Our results suggest that the effect of stressors on creative performance depends on how stress-inducing the stressor is and what type of stress is induced. We found a curvilinear relationship between evaluative stress and creativity such that low evaluative contexts increased creative performance over control conditions, whereas highly evaluative contexts decreased creative performance. We found a linearly negative relationship between uncontrollability and creativity such that more uncontrollability decreased creative performance. The results suggest that stressors' effect on creativity is more complex than previously assumed and points to the need for understanding boundary conditions that shed light on inconsistent findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017868

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a meta-analysis of cortisol reactivity, tasks coded as motivated performance situations were associated with a significant cortisol increase only when they were also coded as uncontrollable and not when the task was coded as controllable.

    “In a meta-analysis of cortisol reactivity, tasks coded as motivated performance situations (i.e., active tasks) were associated with a significant cortisol increase only when they were also coded as uncontrollable and not when the task was coded as controllable (Byron et al., 2010).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Byron et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2010-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
201-212
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W1966602601
Cited by
491
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
22.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
stress, creativity, creative performance, uncontrollability, curvilinear relationship, boundary conditions
MeSH terms
Creativity, Employee Performance Appraisal, Humans, Life Change Events, Psychological Theory, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review