CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 870Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychology of Social InfluenceEmotions and Moral Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A little thanks goes a long way: explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior

Grant, Adam M., Gino, Francesca·2010·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0017935
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although research has established that receiving expressions of gratitude increases prosocial behavior, little is known about the psychological mechanisms that mediate this effect. We propose that gratitude expressions can enhance prosocial behavior through both agentic and communal mechanisms, such that when helpers are thanked for their efforts, they experience stronger feelings of self-efficacy and social worth, which motivate them to engage in prosocial behavior. In Experiments 1 and 2, receiving a brief written expression of gratitude motivated helpers to assist both the beneficiary who expressed gratitude and a different beneficiary. These effects of gratitude expressions were mediated by perceptions of social worth and not by self-efficacy or affect. In Experiment 3, we constructively replicated these effects in a field experiment: A manager's gratitude expression increased the number of calls made by university fundraisers, which was mediated by social worth but not self-efficacy. In Experiment 4, a different measure of social worth mediated the effects of an interpersonal gratitude expression. Our results support the communal perspective rather than the agentic perspective: Gratitude expressions increase prosocial behavior by enabling individuals to feel socially valued.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017935

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 869

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grant, A. M., & Gino, F.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
ORCID
Grant, Adam M.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2010-06
Volume
98
Issue
6
Pages
946-955
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/a0017935
OpenAlex
W2112504820
Cited by
870
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
FWCI
28.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
gratitude expression, prosocial behavior, social worth, self-efficacy, helping behavior, social values
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Communication, Emotions, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motivation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Identification, Social Values, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review