Cited by 1,161Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEmotions and Moral BehaviorAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior: Helping When It Costs You

Bartlett, Monica Y., DeSteno, David·2006·Psychological Science

Abstract

The ability of the emotion gratitude to shape costly prosocial behavior was examined in three studies employing interpersonal emotion inductions and requests for assistance. Study 1 demonstrated that gratitude increases efforts to assist a benefactor even when such efforts are costly (i.e., hedonically negative), and that this increase differs from the effects of a general positive affective state. Additionally, mediational analyses revealed that gratitude, as opposed to simple awareness of reciprocity norms, drove helping behavior. Furthering the theory that gratitude mediates prosocial behavior, Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1 and demonstrated gratitude's ability to function as an incidental emotion by showing it can increase assistance provided to strangers. Study 3 revealed that this incidental effect dissipates if one is made aware of the true cause of the emotional state. Implications of these findings for the role of gratitude in building relationships are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social relational emotions including compassion, gratitude and awe support an individual's capacity to connect with others and are powerful determinants of prosocial behavior.

    “For example, social relational emotions including compassion, gratitude and awe support an individual's capacity to connect with others and are powerful determinants of prosocial behavior (Bartlett and DeSteno, 2005; Grant and Gino, 2010; Lindsay and Creswell, 2014; Stellar et al., 2017).”

    From The Complex Construct of Wellbeing and the Role of Vagal Function (2022) · cites this paper as Bartlett and DeSteno, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2006-04
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
319-325
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2166859536
Cited by
1,161
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 38
FWCI
17.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
gratitude, prosocial behavior, helping behavior, reciprocity norms, emotion induction, costly helping, incidental emotions, positive affect, relationship building
MeSH terms
Affect, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review