The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The family environment as a moderator of psychosocial outcomes following traumatic brain injury in young children.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine whether the family environment moderates psychosocial outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in young children. METHOD: Participants were recruited prospectively from consecutive hospital admissions of 3- to 6-year-old children, and included 19 with severe TBI, 56 with complicated mild/moderate TBI, and 99 with orthopedic injuries (OI). They completed 4 assessments across the first 18 months postinjury. The initial assessment included measures of parenting style, family functioning, and the quality of the home. Children's behavioral adjustment, adaptive functioning, and social competence were assessed at each occasion. Mixed model analyses examined the relationship of the family environment to psychosocial outcomes across time. RESULTS: The OI and TBI groups differed significantly in social competence, but the family environment did not moderate the group difference, which was of medium magnitude. In contrast, group differences in behavioral adjustment became more pronounced across time at high levels of authoritarian and permissive parenting; among children with severe TBI, however, even those with low levels of permissive parenting showed increases in behavioral problems. For adaptive functioning, better home environments provided some protection following TBI, but not over time for the severe TBI group. These 3-way interactions of group, family environment, and time postinjury were all of medium magnitude. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that the family environment moderates the psychosocial outcomes of TBI in young children, but the moderating influence may wane with time among children with severe TBI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.2.218 · Cited by 1,523
Short- and long-term social outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury
YEATES, K. O., SWIFT, E., TAYLOR, H. G., WADE, S. L., DROTAR, D., STANCIN, T., & MINICH, N. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704103093 · Cited by 421
Self-citation
Cited by
Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Rosenfeld, J. V., & Catroppa, C. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0311 · Cited by 224
Crowe, L. M., Catroppa, C., Babl, F. E., & Anderson, V. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0438 · Cited by 119
Ryan, N. P., Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Beauchamp, M. H., Coleman, L., Eren, S., Rosema, S., Taylor, K., & Catroppa, C. (2014) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3153 · Cited by 107
Brown, F. L., Whittingham, K., Boyd, R. N., McKinlay, L., & Sofronoff, K. (2014) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12227 · Cited by 101
Brown, F. L., Whittingham, K., Boyd, R. N., McKinlay, L., & Sofronoff, K. (2015) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.001 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeates, K. O., Taylor, H. G., Walz, N. C., Stancin, T., & Wade, S. L.
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-356
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- OpenAlex
- W2060201425
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.