Cited by 224Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Predictors of cognitive function and recovery 10 years after traumatic brain injury in young children

Anderson, Vicki, Godfrey, Celia, Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V., Catroppa, Cathy·2012·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) has implications for functional outcomes, but few studies have documented long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to plot recovery of cognitive and functional skills after early childhood TBI to 10 years postinjury and to identify the contribution of injury, environment, preinjury characteristics, and acute functional recovery. METHODS: Subjects were recruited consecutively to this prospective, longitudinal study, which used a between-factor design, with injury severity as the independent variable. Forty children with TBI aged 2 and 7 years were recruited on admission to a tertiary pediatric hospital, divided according to injury severity, and compared with 16 healthy controls acutely and 12 and 30 months and 10 years postinjury. Cognition, adaptive ability, executive function, and social/behavioral skills were examined. RESULTS: Children with severe TBI had poorest outcomes, with deficits greatest for cognition. Recovery trajectories were similar across severity groups but with significant gains in verbal skills from 12 and 30 months to 12 months and 10 years. Predictors of outcome included preinjury ability (for adaptive function) and family function (social/behavioral skills). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm a high risk of persisting deficits after severe TBI in early childhood. Children with less severe TBI appear to recover to function normally. Contrary to speculation about "growing into deficits," after protracted recovery to 30 months, young children make age-appropriate progress at least to 10 years postinsult. Environmental factors were found to contribute to adaptive and social/behavioral recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2011-0311

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Rosenfeld, J. V., & Catroppa, C.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
e254-e261
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2162200017
Cited by
224
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, pediatric brain injury, long-term outcomes, cognitive recovery, injury severity, adaptive function, executive function, family functions, verbal ability, recovery trajectories
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intelligence, Language Development Disorders, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Social Environment, Glasgow Coma Scale, Parenting, Brain Injury, Chronic, Family Conflict, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review