Cited by 134Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The impact of depression on social economic decision making

Open access
Harlé, Katia M., Allen, John J. B., Sanfey, Alan G.·2010·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Although the role of emotion in social economic decision making has been increasingly recognized, the impact of mood disorders, such as depression, on such decisions has been surprisingly neglected. To address this gap, 15 depressed and 23 nondepressed individuals completed a well-known economic task, in which they had to accept or reject monetary offers from other players. Although depressed individuals reported a more negative emotional reaction to unfair offers, they accepted significantly more of these offers than did controls. A positive relationship was observed in the depressed group, but not in controls, between acceptance rates of unfair offers and resting cardiac vagal control, a physiological index of emotion regulation capacity. The discrepancy between depressed individuals' increased emotional reactions to unfair offers and their decisions to accept more of these offers contrasts with recent findings that negative mood in nondepressed individuals can lead to lower acceptance rates. This suggests distinct biasing processes in depression, which may be related to higher reliance on regulating negative emotion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018612

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depressed participants accepted significantly more unfair offers (61%) than controls (41%).

    “Harlé et al. (2010) have shown that depressed participants accepted significantly more unfair offers (61%) than controls (41%).”

    From Social functioning in major depressive disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Harlé et al. (2010)

  • The conflicting finding from Harlé et al. (2010) is questionable because the study had several methodological limitations.

    “However, this study had several methodological limitations, which makes this conflicting finding questionable.”

    From Social functioning in major depressive disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Harlé et al. (2010)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harlé, K. M., Allen, J. J. B., & Sanfey, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2010-05
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
440-446
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2099015302
Cited by
134
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R03 MH077058, R01 MH066902)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
depression, ultimatum game, unfair offers, emotional responses, cardiac vagal control, emotion regulation, negative mood, decision bias
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Decision Making, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Game Theory, Games, Experimental, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review