The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
Abstract
The assumption of strongly ignorable treatment assignment is required for eliminating selection bias in observational studies. To meet this assumption, researchers often rely on a strategy of selecting covariates that they think will control for selection bias. Theory indicates that the most important covariates are those highly correlated with both the real selection process and the potential outcomes. However, when planning a study, it is rarely possible to identify such covariates with certainty. In this article, we report on an extensive reanalysis of a within-study comparison that contrasts a randomized experiment and a quasi-experiment. Various covariate sets were used to adjust for initial group differences in the quasi-experiment that was characterized by self-selection into treatment. The adjusted effect sizes were then compared with the experimental ones to identify which individual covariates, and which conceptually grouped sets of covariates, were responsible for the high degree of bias reduction achieved in the adjusted quasi-experiment. Such results provide strong clues about preferred strategies for identifying the covariates most likely to reduce bias when planning a study and when the true selection process is not known.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirical examples exist where controlling for pre-treatment variables demonstrably increases rather than decreases bias.”
From Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable (2014) · cites this paper as Steiner et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“For example, Steiner et al. (2010) report a within-study comparison between an observational study and an experimental benchmark of the effect of an educational intervention on student test scores. In the observational study, the bias in the estimated effect of treatment on math scores increased by about 30% when controlling only for pre-treatment psychological disposition or only for pre”
From Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable (2014) · cites this paper as Steiner et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, they found that although controlling for additional pre-treatment variables generally reduced bias, sometimes including additional controls increased bias.”
From Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable (2014) · cites this paper as Steiner et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“If the pre-treatment collider is also a confounder, then conditioning on it will generally, but not always, remove more bias than it induces (Greenland 2003), especially if the analysis further conditions on many other pre-treatment variables (Steiner et al. 2010).”
From Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable (2014) · cites this paper as Steiner et al. 2010
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Self-citationCausality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
Statistics and Causal Inference
Holland, P. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · Cited by 5,293
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858 · Cited by 2,395
Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation
Rubin, D. B. (2001) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1023/a:1020363010465 · Cited by 2,228 · cited 1×
“After PS-adjustment, standardized mean differences d should be close to zero, and variance ratios v should be close to one (Rubin, 2001).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable
Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455 · Cited by 1,168
Predictors of early growth in academic achievement: the head-toes-knees-shoulders task
McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Duncan, R., Bowles, R. P., Acock, A. C., Miao, A., & Pratt, M. E. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00599 · Cited by 597
Barker, T. H., Stone, J. C., Sears, K., Klugar, M., Leonardi-Bee, J., Tufanaru, C., Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (2023) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-22-00125 · Cited by 471
Frank, K. A., Maroulis, S. J., Duong, M. Q., & Kelcey, B. M. (2013) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713493129 · Cited by 406
Using the Propensity Score Method to Estimate Causal Effects
Li, M. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112447816 · Cited by 382
Nisa, C. F., Bélanger, J. J., Schumpe, B. M., & Faller, D. G. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2 · Cited by 349
Ferguson, C. J. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.002 · Cited by 295
The impact of entrepreneurship education in high school on long-term entrepreneurial performance
Elert, N., Andersson, F. W., & Wennberg, K. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.020 · Cited by 290
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993647.010 · Cited by 279
Research Design in Clinical Psychology
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108993647 · Cited by 240
The Effect of Study Abroad on Intercultural Competence Among Undergraduate College Students
Salisbury, M. H., An, B. P., & Pascarella, E. T. (2013) · NASPA Journal · doi:10.1515/jsarp-2013-0001 · Cited by 250
Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to combat childhood diarrhoea in developing countries
(3ie), I. I. F. I. E., Waddington, H. S., Snilstveit, B., (3ie), I. I. F. I. E., White, H., (3ie), I. I. F. I. E., & Fewtrell, L. (2012) · doi:10.23846/sr0017 · Cited by 229
The Renaissance of Field Experimentation in Evaluating Interventions
Shadish, W. R., & Cook, T. D. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163544 · Cited by 208
Self-citationWest, S. G., Cham, H., & Thoemmes, F. J. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp505 · Cited by 185
Sustainable consumption and third-party certification labels: Consumers’ perceptions and reactions
Brach, S., Walsh, G., & Shaw, D. (2017) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.005 · Cited by 203
Theory and Practice in Nonprobability Surveys
Mercer, A. W., Kreuter, F., Keeter, S., & Stuart, E. A. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw060 · Cited by 183
Marques‐Quinteiro, P., Vargas, R., Eifler, N., & Curral, L. A. (2018) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2018.1551882 · Cited by 167
Hagelskamp, C., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2013) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9570-x · Cited by 160
Implications of Small Samples for Generalization: Adjustments and Rules of Thumb
Tipton, E., Hallberg, K., Hedges, L. V., & Chan, W. (2016) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x16655665 · Cited by 178
Steiner, P. M., Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R. (2011) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998610375835 · Cited by 152
Self-citationSchelvis, R. M. C., Hengel, K. M. O., Alex Burdorf, A., Blatter, B. M., Strijk, J. E., & van der Beek, A. J. (2015) · Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.3505 · Cited by 132
Green, K. M., & Stuart, E. A. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036515 · Cited by 132
Smerillo, N. E., Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., & Ou, S.-R. (2018) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.11.001 · Cited by 125
Employment, late-life work, retirement, and well-being in Europe and the United States
Nikolova, M., & Graham, C. L. (2014) · IZA Journal of European Labor Studies · doi:10.1186/2193-9012-3-5 · Cited by 126
Elpus, K. (2013) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/0022429413485601 · Cited by 124
Chen, G., Huang, S. Z., Meyer‐Doyle, P., & Mindruta, D. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3258 · Cited by 117
Cook, T. D., & Steiner, P. M. (2010) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0018536 · Cited by 117
Self-citationDrawing Causal Inferences Using Propensity Scores: A Practical Guide for Community Psychologists
Lanza, S. T., Moore, J. E., & Butera, N. M. (2013) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9604-4 · Cited by 123
A Primer on Propensity Score Analysis
Shadish, W. R., & Steiner, P. M. (2010) · Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews · doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2009.12.010 · Cited by 121
Self-citationEstablishing Equivalence: Methodological Progress in Group-matching Design and Analysis
Kover, S. T., & Atwood, A. K. (2013) · American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-118.1.3 · Cited by 118
West, S. G., Cham, H., Thoemmes, F. J., Renneberg, B., Schulze, J., & Weiler, M. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036387 · Cited by 118
The Effect of High School Shootings on Schools and Student Performance
Beland, L., & Kim, D. (2015) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373715590683 · Cited by 106
Radičić, D., Pugh, G., & Douglas, D. E. (2018) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0088-3 · Cited by 104
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R. H., & Lüdtke, O. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09662-9 · Cited by 108
Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation.
Coffman, D. L., & Zhong, W. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0029311 · Cited by 103
Tipton, E., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Ahmadi, H. (2018) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1338 · Cited by 112
Strawbridge, L. M., Lloyd, J. T., Meadow, A., Riley, G. F., & Howell, B. L. (2017) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000000653 · Cited by 96
Nieß, C., & Zacher, H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131115 · Cited by 104
Lee, S. W., & Lee, E. A. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102218 · Cited by 105
Matching and Propensity Scores
Steiner, P. M., & Cook, D. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199934874.013.0013 · Cited by 96
Self-citationThe Impact of First-Year Seminars on College Students’ Life-long Learning Orientations
Padgett, R. D., Keup, J. R., & Pascarella, E. T. (2013) · NASPA Journal · doi:10.1515/jsarp-2013-0011 · Cited by 87
The SAGE International Handbook of Educational Evaluation
Ryan, K. E., & Cousins, J. (2009) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452226606 · Cited by 87
Infurna, F. J., & Mayer, A. (2015) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0039050 · Cited by 90
Wagner, J., Becker, M., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614566092 · Cited by 85
Collegial Climate and Novice Teachers’ Intent to Remain Teaching
Pogodzinski, B., Youngs, P. A., & Frank, K. A. (2013) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/673123 · Cited by 85
Propensity score analysis: promise, reality and irrational exuberance
Shadish, W. R. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-012-9166-8 · Cited by 84
Self-citationBowman, N. A., Park, J. J., & Denson, N. (2014) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9353-8 · Cited by 83
Cook, T. D., Steiner, P. M., & Pohl, S. (2009) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170903333673 · Cited by 81
Self-citationSnilstveit, B., Gallagher, E., Phillips, D., Vojtkova, M., Eyers, J., Skaldiou, D., Stevenson, J. L., Bhavsar, A., & Davies, P. (2017) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.176 · Cited by 52
Huang, Y., Meng, Z., Gürsoy, D., & Shi, S. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-01-2020-0028 · Cited by 83
The Millennium Villages Project: a retrospective, observational, endline evaluation
Mitchell, S., Gelman, A., Ross, R., Chen, J., Bari, S., Huynh, U. K., Harris, M. W., Sachs, S. E., Stuart, E. A., Feller, A., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30065-2 · Cited by 80
A Brief Guide to Decisions at Each Step of the Propensity Score Matching Process
Harris, H. D., & Horst, S. J. (2020) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/yq7r-4820 · Cited by 82
Theory and Analysis of Total, Direct, and Indirect Causal Effects
Mayer, A., Thoemmes, F. J., Rose, N., Steyer, R., & West, S. G. (2014) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.931797 · Cited by 78
In transit: The well-being of migrants from transition and post-transition countries
Nikolova, M., & Graham, C. L. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.003 · Cited by 83
Telch, M. J., Bruchey, A. K., Rosenfield, D., Cobb, A. R., Smits, J. A. J., Pahl, S. A., & Gonzalez-Lima, F. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13101407 · Cited by 77
Future Directions in the Study and Treatment of Parent–Child Separation
Humphreys, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1534209 · Cited by 81
Single-Level and Multilevel Mediation Analysis
Tofighi, D., & Thoemmes, F. J. (2013) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431613511331 · Cited by 76
Interactivity in online chat: Conversational cues and visual cues in the service recovery process
Huang, Y., Gürsoy, D., Zhang, M., Nunkoo, R., & Shi, S. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102360 · Cited by 73
Effect of early grade retention on school completion: A prospective study.
Hughes, J. N., West, S. G., Kim, H., & Bauer, S. S. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000243 · Cited by 70
Fernández-García, P., Vallejo-Seco, G., Livácic-Rojas, P., & Tuero-Herrero, E. (2014) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.30.2.166911 · Cited by 51
Balboni, G., Incognito, O., Belacchi, C., Bonichini, S., & Cubelli, R. (2017) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.003 · Cited by 69
Kainz, K., Greifer, N., Givens, A., Swietek, K., Lombardi, B. M., Zietz, S., & Kohn, J. L. (2017) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/691464 · Cited by 71
The impact of technological and non-technological innovations on export intensity in SMEs
Radičić, D., & Djalilov, K. (2019) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-08-2018-0259 · Cited by 63
Parrilli, M. D., & Radičić, D. (2020) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1754343 · Cited by 62
Unbiased Causal Inference From an Observational Study: Results of a Within-Study Comparison
Pohl, S., Steiner, P. M., Eisermann, J., Soellner, R., & Cook, T. D. (2009) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373709343964 · Cited by 64
Self-citationControl variables and causal inference: a question of balance
York, R. (2018) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1468730 · Cited by 62
Day, J. C., Zahn, M. A., & Tichavsky, L. P. (2014) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427814538033 · Cited by 67
PROPENSITY SCORE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF PROPENSITY SCORE APPROACHES USING SAS ® PROCEDURES
Lanehart, R. E., de Gil, P. R., Kim, E., Bellara, A. P., & Lee, R. S. (2012) · Cited by 60
Liang, W., Duan, Y., Shang, B., Hu, C., Baker, J. S., Lin, Z., He, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18041853 · Cited by 60
Zarit, S. H., Bangerter, L. R., Liu, Y., & Rovine, M. J. (2016) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1128881 · Cited by 67
Beauchamp, E., Clements, T., & Milner‐Gulland, E. J. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.008 · Cited by 61
The Effects of Homeownership on Children's Outcomes: Real Effects or Self‐Selection?
Holupka, S., & Newman, S. J. (2012) · Real Estate Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6229.2012.00330.x · Cited by 62
Xu, Y., Xu, D., Simpkins, S. D., & Warschauer, M. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01382-z · Cited by 58
Peña, X., Vélez, M. A., Cárdenas, J.-C., Perdomo, N., & Matajira, C. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.025 · Cited by 56
Collins, R. L., Martino, S. C., Elliott, M. N., & Miu, A. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022563 · Cited by 59
Quasi-experimental designs for causal inference: an overview
Cham, H., Lee, H., & Migunov, I. (2024) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-024-09981-2 · Cited by 55
The Effect of the WIC Program on the Health of Newborns
Foster, E. M., Jiang, M., & Gibson‐Davis, C. M. (2010) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01115.x · Cited by 56
Makai, P., Looman, W., Adang, E., Melis, R. J. F., Stolk, E. A., & Fabbricotti, I. N. (2014) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-014-0583-7 · Cited by 59
Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2017) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831217717815 · Cited by 53
Marcus, S. M., Stuart, E. A., Wang, P., Shadish, W. R., & Steiner, P. M. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028031 · Cited by 53
Self-citationEmpirical Performance of Covariates in Education Observational Studies
Wong, V. C., Valentine, J. C., & Miller-Bains, K. (2016) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2016.1164781 · Cited by 54
Bustamante, A. S., Dearing, E., Zachrisson, H. D., & Vandell, D. L. (2021) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13696 · Cited by 53
ANCOVA versus Change Score for the Analysis of Two-Wave Data
Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2023) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2023.2246187 · Cited by 51
Parrisius, C., Gaspard, H., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101891 · Cited by 58
Randomized Controlled Studies and Alternative Designs in Outcome Studies
Shadish, W. R. (2011) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731511403324 · Cited by 50
Self-citationDo diversity courses improve college student outcomes? A meta-analysis.
Denson, N., Bowman, N. A., Ovenden, G., Culver, K. C., & Holmes, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Diversity in Higher Education · doi:10.1037/dhe0000189 · Cited by 50
Voight, A., & Velez, V. (2018) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2018.1431345 · Cited by 49
Frank, K. A., Penuel, W. R., & Krause, A. E. (2015) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.21817 · Cited by 49
Research on the Academic Benefits of the Advanced Placement Program
Warne, R. T. (2017) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244016682996 · Cited by 49
Breastfeeding and the Child Cognitive Outcomes: A Propensity Score Matching Approach
Jiang, M., Foster, E. M., & Gibson‐Davis, C. M. (2010) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-010-0677-5 · Cited by 48
Promotive and Corrosive Factors in African American Students’ Math Beliefs and Achievement
Diemer, M. A., Marchand, A. D., McKellar, S. E., & Malanchuk, O. (2016) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0439-9 · Cited by 47
Effect of retention in elementary grades on dropping out of school early
Hughes, J. N., Cao, Q., West, S. G., Allee-Smith, P. J., & Cerda, C. A. (2017) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.003 · Cited by 47
Residential Mobility and Delinquency Revisited: Causation or Selection?
Porter, L. C., & Vogel, M. (2013) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-013-9200-7 · Cited by 49
A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study
Kaplan, D. E., & Chen, J. (2012) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-012-9262-8 · Cited by 46
Quantifying the robustness of causal inferences: Sensitivity analysis for pragmatic social science
Frank, K. A., Lin, Q., Xu, R., Maroulis, S. J., & Mueller, A. S. (2022) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102815 · Cited by 45
Becker, M., Neumann, M., Tetzner, J., Böse, S., Knoppick, H., Maaz, K., Baumert, J., & Lehmann, R. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035425 · Cited by 50
Stuart, E. A., DuGoff, E. H., Abrams, M. T., Salkever, D. S., & Steinwachs, D. M. (2013) · eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes) · doi:10.13063/2327-9214.1038 · Cited by 48
Administrative Climate and Novices' Intent to Remain Teaching
Pogodzinski, B., Youngs, P. A., Frank, K. A., & Belman, D. L. (2012) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/667725 · Cited by 45
Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M., & Adhikari, S. (2018) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373718785764 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Steiner, P. M., Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Clark, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 250-267
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2168206775
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 18.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- US Department of Education (R305U070003)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- covariate selection, selection bias, observational studies, quasi-experiments, self-selection, randomized experiments, bias mitigation
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Mathematics, Random Allocation, Models, Statistical, Selection Bias, Causality, Patient Selection, Behavioral Research, Propensity Score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review