Cited by 90Sexual function and dysfunction studiesAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual Relationships

On the interpersonal dynamics of sexuality

Dewitte, Marieke·2014·Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy

Abstract

To date, theory and research on the interpersonal dynamics of sexuality is scarce. This is remarkable because people most often have sex in a relationship. To create more valid models of sexual functioning, it is important to go beyond the study of individual factors and take into account relational and contextual variables, which may act as risk and protective factors for developing, maintaining, and exacerbating sexual problems. This article describes theoretical ideas on how sexuality and relationships can be linked through motivation and emotion regulation. First, the sexual system is conceptualized as an emotion regulation device that involves a dynamic interplay between cognitive, affective, and motivational responses. Then, it is illustrated how partner variables, relationship processes, and sociorelational context may interact with these different responses and eventually shape how sexual emotions are generated and regulated. The author continues with explaining the implications of such emotion-motivational perspective for studying determinants of sexual responding, the role of coregulation in tuning sexual responses in the couple, and the interrelation between the sexual and relational goals of both partners. Linking sexual and nonsexual aspects of relationships and including data of both couple members is necessary for a clearer insight into the nature of sexual dysfunctions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0092623x.2012.710181

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 141 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dewitte, M.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Dewitte, Marieke
Venue
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
209-232
ISSN
  • 0092-623X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0715
OpenAlex
W2082714747
Cited by
89
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, sexual motivation, emotion regulation, sexual emotions, couples, co-regulation, relationship processes
MeSH terms
Arousal, Emotions, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motivation, Sexual Behavior, Sexuality, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review