The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Will they stay or will they go? The role of job embeddedness in predicting turnover in individualistic and collectivistic cultures.
Abstract
Although turnover is an issue of global concern, paradoxically there have been few studies of turnover across cultures. We investigated the cross-cultural generalizability of the job embeddedness model (Mitchell & Lee, 2001) by examining turnover in an individualistic country (United States) and a collectivistic country (India). Using cross-cultural data from call centers (N = 797), we demonstrated that although organization job embeddedness predicted turnover in both countries, different dimensions of job embeddedness predicted turnover in the United States and India. As hypothesized, on the basis of individualism-collectivism theory, person-job fit was a significant predictor of lower turnover in the United States, whereas person-organization fit, organization links, and community links were significant predictors of lower turnover in India. We also explored whether a newly developed construct of embeddedness-family embeddedness-predicts turnover above and beyond job embeddedness and found initial support for its utility in both the United States and India. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Cited by
Chu, C., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Tucker, R. P., Hagan, C. R., Rogers, M. L., Podlogar, M. C., Chiurliza, B., Ringer, F. B., et al. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000123 · Cited by 1,231
Ampofo, E. T., & Karatepe, O. M. (2022) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-07-2021-0858 · Cited by 119
Job embeddedness and voluntary turnover in the face of job insecurity
Peltokorpi, V., & Allen, D. G. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2728 · Cited by 85
Seo, J. (., Nahrgang, J. D., Carter, M. Z., & Hom, P. W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000262 · Cited by 75
Social Context of Turnover-Mixed Methods Study of Indian IT Professionals
Haran, V. V., & Niederman, F. (2022) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.299320 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramesh, A., & Gelfand, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 807-823
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2154016291
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- Society of Industrial/Organizational Psychology
- Society of Human Resources Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.