Cited by 94Face Recognition and PerceptionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

How do depressed and healthy adults interpret nuanced facial expressions?

Open access
Gollan, Jackie K., McCloskey, Michael, Hoxha, Denada, Coccaro, Emil F.·2010·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

This study investigates the discrimination accuracy of emotional stimuli in subjects with major depression compared with healthy controls using photographs of facial expressions of varying emotional intensities. The sample included 88 unmedicated male and female subjects, aged 18-56 years, with major depressive disorder (n = 44) or no psychiatric illness (n = 44), who judged the emotion of 200 facial pictures displaying an expression between 10% (90% neutral) and 80% (nuanced) emotion. Stimuli were presented in 10% increments to generate a range of intensities, each presented for a 500-ms duration. Compared with healthy volunteers, depressed subjects showed very good recognition accuracy for sad faces but impaired recognition accuracy for other emotions (e.g., harsh, surprise, and sad expressions) of subtle emotional intensity. Recognition accuracy improved for both groups as a function of increased intensity on all emotions. Finally, as depressive symptoms increased, recognition accuracy increased for sad faces, but decreased for surprised faces. Moreover, depressed subjects showed an impaired ability to accurately identify subtle facial expressions, indicating that depressive symptoms influence accuracy of emotional recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0020234

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depressed patients showed impaired recognition accuracy for emotional expressions of subtle intensity.

    “they showed impaired recognition accuracy for emotional expressions of subtle intensity (Gollan et al., 2010).”

    From Social functioning in major depressive disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Gollan et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ingram RE Kendall PC Smith TW Donnell C Ronan K 1987 Cognitive specificity in emotional distress Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 734 742 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.734 3681649 · DOI
  2. Jaeger J Borod J Peselow E 1987 Depressed patients have atypical hemisphere biases in the perception of emotional chimeric faces Journal of Abnormal Psychology 96 321 324 10.1037/0021-843X.96.4.321 3693681 · DOI
  3. Keppel G 1991 Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook 3 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall
  4. Persad SM Polivy J 1993 Differences between depressed and nondepressed individuals in the recognition of and response to facial cues Journal of Abnormal Psychology 102 358 368 10.1037/0021-843X.102.3.358 8408947 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Suslow T Junghanns K Arolt V 2001 Detection of facial expression of emotions of depression Perceptual and Motor Skills 92 857 868 10.2466/PMS.92.3.857-868 11453215 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gollan, J. K., McCloskey, M., Hoxha, D., & Coccaro, E. F.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2010-11
Volume
119
Issue
4
Pages
804-810
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2074712886
Cited by
94
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, facial expression recognition, emotional intensity, emotion discrimination, sadness, surprise, depressive symptoms, emotion perception, face images
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Severity of Illness Index, Social Perception, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review