The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit.
Abstract
The other-race effect (ORE), or the finding that same-race faces are better recognized than other-race faces, is one of the best replicated phenomena in face recognition. The current article reviews existing evidence and theory and proposes a new theoretical framework for the ORE, which argues that the effect results from a confluence of social categorization, motivated individuation, and perceptual experience. This categorization-individuation model offers not only a parsimonious account of both classic and recent evidence for category-based biases in face recognition but also links the ORE to broader evidence and theory in social cognition and face perception. Finally, the categorization-individuation model makes a series of novel predictions for how the ORE can be exacerbated, attenuated, or even eliminated via perceptual and motivational processes, both by improving other-race recognition and by reducing same-race recognition. The authors propose that this new model for the ORE also leads to applied interventions that differ sharply from other theories of the ORE, while simultaneously providing an integrative theoretical framework for future research on the ORE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass.
Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466 · Cited by 2,542
First Impressions: Making Up Your Mind After a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x · Cited by 2,300
Domain specificity in face perception
Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77664 · Cited by 968
Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616 · Cited by 697
Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories.
Sporer, S. L. (2001) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.36 · Cited by 545
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/026999399379050 · Cited by 458
Cited by
The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review
Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025750 · Cited by 346
Learning Race from Face: A Survey
Fu, S., He, H., & Hou, Z.-G. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2321570 · Cited by 178
Facial age affects emotional expression decoding
Fölster, M., Hess, U., & Werheid, K. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00030 · Cited by 139
The Development of Attentional Biases for Faces in Infancy: A Developmental Systems Perspective
Reynolds, G. D., & Roth, K. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00222 · Cited by 53
Herzmann, G., Bird, C. W., Freeman, M., & Curran, T. (2013) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.04.002 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1168-1187
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W1980880567
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 15.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0020463
- The paper
- Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
