The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search?
Open accessAbstract
Many visual search experiments measure response time (RT) as their primary dependent variable. Analyses typically focus on mean (or median) RT. However, given enough data, the RT distribution can be a rich source of information. For this paper, we collected about 500 trials per cell per observer for both target-present and target-absent displays in each of three classic search tasks: feature search, with the target defined by color; conjunction search, with the target defined by both color and orientation; and spatial configuration search for a 2 among distractor 5s. This large data set allows us to characterize the RT distributions in detail. We present the raw RT distributions and fit several psychologically motivated functions (ex-Gaussian, ex-Wald, Gamma, and Weibull) to the data. We analyze and interpret parameter trends from these four functions within the context of theories of visual search.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419 · Cited by 2,147
Self-citationThe effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision
Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/5.5.1 · Cited by 691
Cited by
Guided Search 6.0: an updated model of visual search
Wolfe, J. M. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9 · Cited by 703
Self-citationFrom salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search
Purcell, B. A., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4622-11.2012 · Cited by 179
Widge, A. S., Zorowitz, S., Basu, I., Paulk, A. C., Cash, S. S., Eskandar, E. N., Deckersbach, T., Miller, E. K., & Dougherty, D. D. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09557-4 · Cited by 152
A behavioral neuroenergetics theory of ADHD
Killeen, P. R., Russell, V. A., & Sergeant, J. A. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.011 · Cited by 97
Advancing research on unconscious priming: when can scientists claim an indirect task advantage?
Meyen, S., Zerweck, I. A., Amado, C., von Luxburg, U., & Franz, V. H. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0001065 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, E. M., Horowitz, T. S., Torralba, A., & Wolfe, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-71
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W1561320973
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0020747
- The paper
- Palmer, E. M., Horowitz, T. S., Torralba, A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2011). What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
