Cited by 97Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A behavioral neuroenergetics theory of ADHD

Killeen, Peter R., Russell, Vivienne A., Sergeant, Joseph A.·2013·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Energetic insufficiency in neurons due to inadequate lactate supply is implicated in several neuropathologies, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). By formalizing the mechanism and implications of such constraints on function, the behavioral Neuroenergetics Theory (NeT) predicts the results of many neuropsychological tasks involving individuals with ADHD and kindred dysfunctions, and entails many novel predictions. The associated diffusion model predicts that response times will follow a mixture of Wald distributions from the attentive state, and ex-Wald distributions after attentional lapses. It is inferred from the model that ADHD participants can bring only 75-85% of the neurocognitive energy to bear on tasks, and allocate only about 85% of the cognitive resources of comparison groups. Parameters derived from the model in specific tasks predict performance in other tasks, and in clinical conditions often associated with ADHD. The primary action of therapeutic stimulants is to increase norepinephrine in active regions of the brain. This activates glial adrenoceptors, increasing the release of lactate from astrocytes to fuel depleted neurons. The theory is aligned with other approaches and integrated with more general theories of ADHD. Therapeutic implications are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.011

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While mechanistic hypotheses have been proposed for behavioral features of ADHD, empirical research validating these frameworks remains elusive.

    “While mechanistic hypotheses have been proposed for behavioral features of ADHD (e.g. [75]), empirical research validating these frameworks remains elusive.”

    From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [75]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Killeen, P. R., Russell, V. A., & Sergeant, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Killeen, Peter R.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
625-657
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017350194
Cited by
97
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, norepinephrine, stimulant medication, cognitive resource allocation, response time distribution, attentional lapses, diffusion models
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Norepinephrine, Psychomotor Performance, Receptors, Adrenergic, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review