Cited by 29Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCounseling Practices and Supervision

Improved treatment outcome associated with the shift to empirically supported treatments in an outpatient clinic is maintained over a ten-year period

Cukrowicz, Kelly C., Timmons, Katherine A., Sawyer, Kathryn, Caron, Kelly M., Gummelt, Haley D., Joiner, Thomas E.·2011·Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increase in emphasis on the use of psychological treatments that are supported by empirical data, as advocates have argued these treatments lead to better patient outcomes. We have previously shown that a shift to use of empirically supported treatments in a training clinic led to significant improvement in patient outcomes over four years (Cukrowicz et al., 2005). In the current study, we examined whether average patient outcomes at termination continued to be favorable over the six-year period following the initial shift. We examined data from 549 patients (M age 25.78, SD 10.08; 322 females and 227 males) treated prior to and after the shift to empirically supported treatments, all of whom were rated after termination using the Clinical Global Impression rating scale to track their improvement during treatment. The current study found that improvements in patient outcomes continued over the six-year follow-up period. Patients treated during the follow-up period had superior outcomes when compared to those treated following the initial shift to empirically supported treatments (effect size .28, p 05) and when compared to those treated prior to the shift to empirically supported treatments (effect size 1.83, p .001). Thus, this study points both to the efficacy of empirically supported treatments in clinical practice and to the feasibility of implementing and successfully maintaining EST use in a training clinic setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021937

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cukrowicz, K. C., Timmons, K. A., Sawyer, K., Caron, K. M., Gummelt, H. D., & Joiner, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Published
2011-04
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
145-152
ISSN
  • 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1323
OpenAlex
W2027845708
Cited by
29
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
empirically supported treatments, treatment outcomes, outpatient psychotherapy, long-term follow-up, treatment discontinuation, Clinical Global Impression Scale, training clinic, evidence-based practice implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review