Cited by 25Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Virtual Reality (VR) Treatments for Anxiety Disorders Are Unambiguously Successful, so Why Are so Few Therapists Using It? Barriers to Adoption and Potential Solutions

Open access
Wray, Tyler B., Kemp, Joshua J., Larsen, Margo Adams·2023·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are a significant cause of disability globally, yet only one in ten sufferers receives adequate quality treatment. Exposure-based therapies are effective in reducing symptoms associated with a number of anxiety disorders. However, few therapists use exposure techniques to treat these conditions, even when they are adequately trained in them, often because of concerns about provoking distress, drop out, logistical barriers, and other concerns. Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) can address many of these concerns, and a large body of research decisively shows that VRET is as efficacious for treating these conditions as in vivo exposures. Yet, use of VRET remains low. In this article, we discuss several factors we believe are contributing to low VRET adoption among therapists and raise potential solutions to address them. We consider steps that VR experience developers and researchers might take, such as leading studies of VRET's real-world effectiveness and treatment optimization trials and continuing to improve the fit of platforms with clinicians' workflows. We also discuss steps to address therapist reservations using aligned implementation strategies, as well as barriers for clinics, and the roles that professional organizations and payers could have in improving care by encouraging adoption of VRET.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2023.2229017

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently, freely available dedicated VRET applications for acrophobia or claustrophobia treatment are either not scientifically validated or developed for clinical use, or share a technological bias of being delivered through a smartphone-powered interface, such as the Easy Heights application.

    “Currently, freely available dedicated VRET applications for acrophobia or claustrophobia treatment are either not scientifically validated or developed for clinical use [37,44], or share a technological bias of being delivered through a smartphone-powered interface, such as the Easy Heights application [45].”

    From SAFEvR MentalVeRse.app: Development of a Free Immersive Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Acrophobia and Claustrophobia (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Landauer TK (1997). Chapter 9 -Behavioral Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. In
  2. Palma B (2021). Returning to providing psychotherapy in-person during a pandemic after providing online services: musing from an early career psychologist. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 56(3), 11-13.
  3. Rothbaum BO, Hodges L, & Smith S (1999). Virtual reality exposure therapy abbreviated treatment manual: Fear of flying application. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 6(3), 234-244.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wray, T. B., Kemp, J. J., & Larsen, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Virtually Better (US)
Corresponding author
Wray, Tyler B.
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2023-06-28
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
603-624
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W4382345268
Cited by
25
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Brown University
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (L30 AA023336)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, anxiety disorders, exposure therapy, in vivo exposure, treatment discontinuation, clinician workflow, implementation strategies, health insurance coverage, professional associations, technology adoption in clinical practice
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review